11-05-2024, 04:47 PM
(11-05-2024, 03:27 PM)mvossman Wrote: I respect your mature response.
Could I have specified only one of the picks was a first? Yes. Could I have put the phase "I don't think" in front of Dinwiddie not being an asset? Yes. I thought those were implied, but I do see that it was not specifically worded and it could be read differently. I generally try to be clear and specific in my posts, but sometimes you make a distracted post that doesn't perfectly dot the eyes.
As for the seconds, I'm not saying that second round picks have no value, but when we are talking about a trade that would require many, may firsts, their value seems inconsequential to me.
As we have both pointed out a while ago, this is a pointless discussion as neither of us believe there is a reasonable path to a Giannis trade to the Mavs. After reading the several childish responses from the OP, I put on ignore and don't intend to engage again.
You were not ambiguous. You stated "Din was not seen as an asset". You're stating how the league looked at Din, what his worth was. That's simply incorrect. A little research and less emotion you would have seen that.
Instead you throw out whatever you can to be right. Again, be better.
Are you now trying to say you don't think Din was seen as an asset by the league? If so, cool.