11-05-2024, 11:19 AM
(11-05-2024, 10:47 AM)mvossman Wrote: As I stated above, Din not being an asset is my opinion. We state opinions on here all the time without using the "I think" or "I believe" because that gets annoying to write every time, and when discussing something like asset value its obviously an opinion.
Din was bad with the Wizards and had a significant injury before that. I think front offices look at more than the most recent performance when assessing value on a 9 year vet. I would also argue that the fact that the Nets gave up on him so quickly suggests that maybe they were not all that invested in him to begin with.
Nice gaslighting, lol.
A page out of your book... " Din was not considered an asset". That is a factual statement on what he was considered in general, not your opinion. Again, you make up facts to support your opinions.