Trade & FA 2024-25:

[mvossman]

So it's not Din's worth at the time of the trade, but what he became in the future?  Say that out loud.

Dude, just admit you reacted without researching.  You made up that Din wasn't an asset because it fit your opinion, not because it was a fact.  Again, your "facts" come from your opinion, not vice versa.  Be better.

As I stated above, Din not being an asset is my opinion.  We state opinions on here all the time without using the "I think" or "I believe" because that gets annoying to write every time, and when discussing something like asset value its obviously an opinion.

Din was bad with the Wizards and had a significant injury before that.  I think front offices look at more than the most recent performance when assessing value on a 9 year vet.  I would also argue that the fact that the Nets gave up on him so quickly suggests that maybe they were not all that invested in him to begin with.