Hoopshype Top 78 Ever

[dirkfansince1998]

As in previous years, we held a team vote with the opinions of eight HoopsHype staff members, discarded the highest and lowest ranks for each player, and awarded points based on the remaining positions.

Pretty sure that the average fan board could come up with something better. Min amount of effort. Max amount of controversy/clicks/reach.

Make it an accolade, boxscore, +/- metric based list or a combination of all of those things instead of just publishing stuff without any way to understand why they ranked them the way they did.
For example. If you want to make the case that Garnett > Dirk you cannot have Carmelo > Howard. If you want to make the case that longevity matters and Malone belongs among the top 15 you cannot have current players as high. What is Malone's case over current Jokic/Giannis? And why is Curry the exception even though he has less prime/peak seasons than most all time greats?