FA: Spencer Dinwiddie Heads to DAL | 1 yr/vet min

[F Gump]

1 The first part isn't (at all, like even close) to what I said. 

2  My point about THOSE guys was to illustrate the lack of a need (in my mind) for another Dinwiddie type (in addition to Hardy). I DON'T think that's a step in the right direction if he (Dinwiddie) plays a lot. 

1 My apologies. Not intended. I thought I was properly speaking to your intended point, but you know better than me. Sorry.

2 My perception of "why did they sign SD" and "how does he fit" is certainly different than yours.
...a. I think he was signed to fill in for players who do create offense, and don't play defense that well (because that's who he is) -- and I don't think he will be used otherwise.
...b. I don't think he will play a lot, barring some significant extend-time injury to either Luka or Kyrie. Because he's here imo as insurance for those players.
...c. In fact, I'm not convinced SD will be above Exum in the general pecking order, because Exum has already shown he is a 2-way player who can also be used as 2nd (or 3rd) ball-handler/creator. SD would have to be WAYYYYY better on the offensive end, in order to be higher in the pecking order. imo