07-03-2024, 08:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-03-2024, 08:19 PM by KillerLeft.)
(07-03-2024, 08:14 PM)Smitty Wrote: There’s no cap hold. You’re waiving the 14th player and replacing with another player on a vet minimum.
But there has to be a cap hold, because there is no 14th guy on that form. He didn’t include Lawson, and I remember asking him about that the other night. I believe they are required to carry 14 players, but not 15, so some type of cap hold has to be in place for the 14th roster spot, right?
What I am asking right now, very poorly, is whether or not he has included that cap hold for slot 14 into his thinking when coming up with that 174m + “apron salary” number. Because if so, it seems like a vet minimum contract, would you guys tell me only counts about that same amount, would simply replace that cap hold that is already factored in, meaning they’d THEN still have the 3.7 under his cushion.
I assume the answer is no, but does what I’m asking make sense?