07-10-2023, 09:36 AM
(07-10-2023, 09:23 AM)DallasMaverick Wrote: It's also possible that it's a crapshoot, and that experts who spend thousands of hours researching and evaluating can't really project with any certainty whatsoever whether Player X will actually be an NBA player, or will be any better than Player Y.
So, rather than pillory front offices for "missing" on "obvious" picks, we should cut them a little slack and realize there's a pretty high degree of randomness in the whole process.
...and perhaps we should be a little slower to declare a GM as "genius" because he happens to hit on two picks in a row.
When you go to Vegas, do you stop and congratulate the slot machine winners because of their superior skill?
Yet, player evaluation is not merely a random "slot machine" style gamble. Some front offices simply do a much better job of player evaluation and are rewarded with more hits than misses. Grading on the curve, I suspect the Mavs FO to be on the lower end of that spectrum.