Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Statistically Determining Defense
#7
(06-16-2023, 12:22 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: Sorry.  There were some type-os.  Corrected.

8% -- Paint-Dfg%
19% -- Paint-Missed FGs
6% -- Mid-Dfg%
13% -- Mid-Missed FGs
3% -- 3pt-Dfg%
11% -- 3pt-Missed FGs
6% -- Defensive Loose Balls Gained
2% -- Charges Drawn
7% -- Defensive Box-outs Resulting in Team RB
17% -- Defensive Rebounds
6% -- Blocks
2% -- Steals

So, looking at that specific weight, I'm putting 43% of the overall weight on # of FGs missed.  Looking at that piece, the 3 ranges break down as follows:
Paint - 44%
Mid - 30%
3pt - 26%

In today's NBA of centers having to switch on defense and guard stretch bigs, I'm happy with this weighting.  What are your thoughts?
I like opponent fg% a bit more than you do, but it looks pretty good. Breaking down blocks and steals a bit more might be a decent addition, albeit I haven’t delved into numbers enough to know what can be used. I’m starting to seriously consider paying to get profitx for next season. If the Mavs have a good offseason I probably will.
Like Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by ItsGoTime - 06-16-2023, 01:16 PM
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by Jym - 06-16-2023, 02:59 PM
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by Jym - 06-16-2023, 07:00 PM
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by Jym - 06-17-2023, 04:10 PM
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by Jym - 06-17-2023, 09:38 PM
RE: Statistically Determining Defense - by Jym - 06-18-2023, 02:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)