01-30-2022, 12:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2022, 12:19 AM by dynamicalVoid.)
(01-29-2022, 11:36 PM)Jommybone Wrote: Yes. Don’t think you are considering the alternatives. Maybe you are and just hate the signing that much.
But not signing him wouldn’t have magically created cap space. It would have made it easier to avoid luxury tax while keeping DFS and JB, which is a good thing. But don’t see how it would’ve helped in any other way.
Are you sure you're not making it as if Mavs didn't have alternatives to signing thj to a bad contract? Every other contract with another player would have been equally as bad or equally as strenuous on the cap?
All these people saying it was a bad move or not ideal...and you're defending it as if there were no other options. Is that correct?
Mavs had no other option but to sign a bad contract?