12-17-2021, 02:24 PM
(12-17-2021, 01:52 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Not sure why changing the argument to 2010 makes more sense...
Just because my first post, which you responded to, was specifically a reply to your saying that we should have got rid of him after 2007! And your response to that was to cite problems in 2008, 2009 and 2010!!