Creating w/o another Creator?

[DanSchwartzgan]

I read Dan's post differently than @"KillerLeft"and especially @"F Gump". I didn't read the post and then think that Dan was saying (1) that the Mavs don't need a secondary creator, (2) are ok with not getting a secondary creator or (3) might have a plan to remove the need of a secondary creator. 


My takeway wasn't "this is the plan instead of a secondary creator", it was "here's another way to create scoring that can diversify the offense and there is a little evidence that the Mavs might be think that way."

I think we need a scondary creator, regardless. Ideally, we could have a secondary creator AND better player and ball movement!

Yes.  At some point we can hopefully move from should-have and could-have to what we actually-have.  I thought the Smoking Cuban piece that showed some differences between Kidd's tendencies and Mav tendencies to be interesting.  But, the article didn't go any further in terms of evaluating whether the guys we added are adept at making that kind of change.  It appears to me that they are.