08-09-2021, 01:15 PM
It has struck me that it might be a useful construct to divide the assessment of the situation into two parts -- the front office, and the offseason as a whole.
Under that framework, you probably have to give the front office a C or so, given that they had limited assets to work with, and may have played a meh hand reasonably well for all we know.
Whereas, judging the offseason as a whole, which is more an assessment of the entire body of work determining where they are in the team-building process at this point in the Luka era, it seems that this is a critical offseason in terms of being the last one with money to spend, and that they should have been in a better position than they were, and should have made stronger moves toward solidifying the roster than they did.
It's not over, of course.
Under that framework, you probably have to give the front office a C or so, given that they had limited assets to work with, and may have played a meh hand reasonably well for all we know.
Whereas, judging the offseason as a whole, which is more an assessment of the entire body of work determining where they are in the team-building process at this point in the Luka era, it seems that this is a critical offseason in terms of being the last one with money to spend, and that they should have been in a better position than they were, and should have made stronger moves toward solidifying the roster than they did.
It's not over, of course.