2020-2021 ROSTER TALK: Archived - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: 2020-2021 ROSTER TALK: Archived (/showthread.php?tid=682) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
|
RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - jesusshuttlesworth82 - 01-15-2021 As much as I like Jrich, he's not a playmaker. He had one year where he averaged over 3 assists a game. People just ran with that storyline because terrible nba analyst Kevin OConner said so. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - HanspardsShowerVoice - 01-15-2021 I would be surprised if the Spurs get much for DeRozan. He's a UFA at the end of the year and they have no intention of signing him, so he's a depreciating asset for them. He is going to want to test the 2021 FA Market that is high on cap space demand and low on talent supply, so he only appeals as a short term rental for a contender. He's also on a huge contract number that is hard to match salaries with, especially for contenders who don't want to give up their high end talent. That's going to narrow down the pool of suitors significantly. He also plays a style of ball that isn't en vogue in the league right now, so that might suppress demand down a bit too. That said, I do like DeRozan a lot for the Mavs though as a 2nd playmaker with Luka. One thing I like to look at in scorers and bucket getters is Usage to AST% together as an indicator of how much you can let an offense run through a player without him ball hogging. DeRozan has been been a high usage player, though that has declined with age, but he's also had a high AST%. You can pair that guy up with Luka without much disruption to your offense. This year DeRozan has 23% Usage with 30.6 AST%. He's involved in a lot of plays, but he gets others involved too. In comparison Buddy Hield right now has 27.2% Usage and a 15.5% AST%. When Buddy gets the ball, Buddy is jacking it. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Hypermav - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 01:18 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - david75090 - 01-15-2021 https://media.giphy.com/media/5Yft6zICE2v6fZSqLD/giphy.gif RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - omahen - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 08:29 AM)HanspardsShowerVoice Wrote: I would be surprised if the Spurs get much for DeRozan. He's a UFA at the end of the year and they have no intention of signing him, so he's a depreciating asset for them. He is going to want to test the 2021 FA Market that is high on cap space demand and low on talent supply, so he only appeals as a short term rental for a contender. He's also on a huge contract number that is hard to match salaries with, especially for contenders who don't want to give up their high end talent. That's going to narrow down the pool of suitors significantly. He also plays a style of ball that isn't en vogue in the league right now, so that might suppress demand down a bit too. Exactly my thoughts, but I can't write them down with so many arguments. I see an opportunity to trade Powell in this kind of trade, as you need salary to match 28 million of DeRozan. It will be interesting to see if Powell remains as top 4 big or falls out of rotation behind KP, WCS, Kleber and JJ. If he does, it makes absolutely no sense to keep him, unless he is really, really, really, really indispensable for the locker room. If I assume Johnson+Powell+Brunson+1FRP trade, spots 1-3 would be occupied by Luka, THJ, JRich, DeRozan and DFS. Burke and Green as deep bench. 4-5 rotation would be KP, WCS, Kleber with DFS or Luka spot minutes. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Mavs2019 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 09:22 AM)omahen Wrote: Exactly my thoughts, but I can't write them down with so many arguments. I see an opportunity to trade Powell in this kind of trade, as you need salary to match 28 million of DeRozan. It will be interesting to see if Powell remains as top 4 big or falls out of rotation behind KP, WCS, Kleber and JJ. If he does, it makes absolutely no sense to keep him, unless he is really, really, really, really indispensable for the locker room. If I assume Johnson+Powell+Brunson+1FRP trade, spots 1-3 would be occupied by Luka, THJ, JRich, DeRozan and DFS. Burke and Green as deep bench. 4-5 rotation would be KP, WCS, Kleber with DFS or Luka spot minutes.I think the problem might be that he is really really really really impossible to trade. We gave up two 2nd round picks to get rid of Wright, who has more legs and less years. The only way to get rid of Powell is to salary match a long-term deal like Love, Blake or Westbrook, if you are into injury-prone or/and washed-up performers on big deals. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - omahen - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 09:45 AM)Mavs2019 Wrote: I think the problem might be that he is really really really really impossible to trade. We gave up two 2nd round picks to get rid of Wright, who has more legs and less years. The only way to get rid of Powell is to salary match a long-term deal like Love, Blake or Westbrook, if you are into injury-prone or/and washed-up performers on big deals. I would say that at this point Powell has a very similar negative value as Wright contract. Wright had 2 seasons left on his deal, Powell will have 2.5 at TDL. He is only one year older than Wright, basically same age. From San Antonio perspective - can they hope to get a deal Indy got for Oladipo? Similar value player on a longer contract? Kind of doubt it. It also doesn't really make sense that a non contender trades for half a year rental of DeRozan. So their options are limited to contenders. Which of them has 28 mil of salary to match that is better than Powell? Is Gary Harris type of contract so much better value for a rebuilding team San Antonio has to become at one point? In my idea, they would get a young player and FRP for half a year rental and additional two years of Powell. I think it is borderline fair value. Throw in a second of two if you think they need more. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - dirkfansince1998 - 01-15-2021 (01-14-2021, 09:42 PM)omahen Wrote: Looking just at the offensive side, DeRozan would be an excellent secondary facilitator. I wonder what his price would be at TDL I don´t think the Mavs will trade for a defensive liability like DeRozan. Everything they did over the last couple of month suggests that they are all in on a more defensive minded approach. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Mavs2019 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 10:02 AM)omahen Wrote: I would say that at this point Powell has a very similar negative value as Wright contract. Wright had 2 seasons left on his deal, Powell will have 2.5 at TDL. He is only one year older than Wright, basically same age.I honestly don´t know. I think a lot will depend on what Pop does and if he is unsure about his future at the moment, then I feel they won´t do him dirty by trading away their best player. Maybe they just run down his contract and see whether they can actually re-sign him as a veteran leader to their young core. It´s a tough decision. I like DeRozan a lot. Always have. He´s a good guy to root for and has been good leader for years. I don´t think he´d mind the JET role either. (01-15-2021, 10:19 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: I don´t think the Mavs will trade for a defensive liability like DeRozan. Everything they did over the last couple of month suggests that they are all in on a more defensive minded approach.They got all the defense they need. Now they need another offensive impact player imho. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - dirkfansince1998 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 10:20 AM)Mavs2019 Wrote: They got all the defense they need. Now they need another offensive impact player imho. They need two-way impact. We finally moved away from one-way/one-trick players. No reason to go back now. Inserting DeRozan into the lineup would lead to dimished returns. Worse defense and spacing in return for another shot creator. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - KillerLeft - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 11:09 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: They need two-way impact. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - fifteenth - 01-15-2021 Just say NO to DeRO RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - omahen - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 10:19 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: I don´t think the Mavs will trade for a defensive liability like DeRozan. Everything they did over the last couple of month suggests that they are all in on a more defensive minded approach. I am not much of an advanced stats guy but quick glance doesn't say DeRozan is a liability on defense. On the other hand, he is a huge positive on offense. Perhaps we should revisit this conversation at TDL. I predict it will become obvious by then that Mavs desperately need another creator. Once the intense season starts taking a toll on Luka. He basically played just offense last season and he was exhausted by all stars. Mavs didn't do anything to reduce his load on offense and now he is even asked to lead on defense. And he "allegedly" came in fat and unprepared. I am not saying DeRozan is the best option out there. But he is certainly one that could be available and obtainable with Mavs assets. If he is prepared to buy into 3rd banana or even 6th man role, he would be a great addition to the squad imho RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - dirkfansince1998 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 12:38 PM)omahen Wrote: I am not much of an advanced stats guy but quick glance doesn't say DeRozan is a liability on defense. On the other hand, he is a huge positive on offense. Perhaps we should revisit this conversation at TDL. I predict it will become obvious by then that Mavs desperately need another creator. Once the intense season starts taking a toll on Luka. He basically played just offense last season and he was exhausted by all stars. Mavs didn't do anything to reduce his load on offense and now he is even asked to lead on defense. And he "allegedly" came in fat and unprepared. Defensive on/off: 16/17: +5.7 17/18: +5.8 18/19: +2.2 19/20: +5.9 20/21: +18.4 (small sample size...with DeRozan on the floor they rank 29th in D-Rating, without him 1st...obviously not as easy because DeRozan plays vs starters but it shows how much worse they are) Not a single season in his entire career where the defense wasn´t worse with him on the floor. DRPM: 16/17: -0.38 17/18: -1.52 18/19: +0.65 (that´s exactly where THJ ranked last season) 19/20: -1.68 Overall he ranks somewhere between all time bad (Trae Young, Isaiah Thomas) and below average (Seth Curry, JJB). Not really the kind of player I want to see in a featured role on a team with the 2nd best D-Rating and best DFG% in the league. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Kammrath - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 12:38 PM)omahen Wrote: I am not much of an advanced stats guy but quick glance doesn't say DeRozan is a liability on defense. Yeah his numbers like @"dirkfansince1998" pointed out are bad. Not interested. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Mavs2019 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 02:23 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Defensive on/off:What you mean all-time bad? NBA.com Def RTG rates Trae Young as a top 50 defensive player this season way ahead of Josh Richardson. WCS basically is the best player in the league according to Net RTG, while Rondo is literally the best offensive and worst defensive player in the league. Also if we don´t want DeRozan due to his defensive rating, does that mean we have to can Maxi, too? His offensive ratings are just as bad, -0.63 ORPM while playing on the greatest offense in NBA history in 2019/2020. I miss the days of simple logic that if you are the 2nd best defensive team and 21st best offensive team, that you need to add some offensive talent. Of course I wouldn´t mind to get a 25/5/5 player, who is also playing elite defense. Are PG 13/Kawhi or Brown/Tatum available? RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - dirkfansince1998 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 04:13 PM)Mavs2019 Wrote: NBA.com Def RTG rates Trae Young as a top 50 defensive player this season way ahead of Josh Richardson. Trae Young had the worst DRPM of the last few years in his first two seasons. As I mentioned in the post above. The sample size is still really small and Richardson ranks among the worst Mavs in overall net rating so far. Mavs are -11.4 with him on the floor. Only one worse is Powell at -12.3. Richardson played a lot of minutes in the bad games early in the season and was out during the recent winning streak (01-15-2021, 04:13 PM)Mavs2019 Wrote: Also if we don´t want DeRozan due to his defensive rating, does that mean we have to can Maxi, too? His offensive ratings are just as bad, -0.63 ORPM while playing on the greatest offense in NBA history in 2019/2020. Roles and expectations? Maxi is a spot up shooter on offense. Nothing more nothing less. So far he has the single best offensive rating on the team because of his hot shooting start. Maxi is also way cheaper and doesn´t expect starter money and minutes. (01-15-2021, 04:13 PM)Mavs2019 Wrote: I miss the days of simple logic that if you are the 2nd best defensive team and 21st best offensive team, that you need to add some offensive talent. Of course I wouldn´t mind to get a 25/5/5 player, who is also playing elite defense. Are PG 13/Kawhi or Brown/Tatum available? I am waiting for the days where people finally move on from the medieval way to look at counting stats and start to look at synergy, lineups and tracking data. You don´t have to agree with everything the numbers are telling you but there is no way to deny that DeRozan has been a bad defender for his entire career. Inserting him into the lineup is the best way to turn the 2nd best defensive into an average one. Not to mention that I am not even sure if he would help on offense. As a 6th man when Luka is out? Without a doubt. Next to Luka? Spacing gets even worse and that has been the biggest problem this season. In terms of impact vs counting numbers DeRozan is the poster child for empty stats. Only had positive on/off numbers once in his entire career (+3.9 in his 3rd season). The sample size is huge. Over his entire career his teams are -2.9 when he is on the floor and that´s not just because of some strange lineups. A good example for good net impact played right next to him for most of his career. DeRozan had the flashy numbers but the team was just as good or even better without him. Lowry was the impact player. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Omega_Supreme - 01-15-2021 I have somewhat changed my expectations to short term vs long term needs. My short term wants on this team are very realistic Short Term - all have cap friendly contracts and can possibly be had. Burks and Holmes are expiring. 1. Alec Burks, one of the highest efficiency ratings in the league. We need more bench firepower and he can play all wing spots 2. George Hill, good defensive guard and great shooter. 3. Richaun Holmes, good athletic big plays just like Montrez and physical Long Term Aaron Gordon Richaun Holmes George Hill https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCwGn4Iw7nQ&t=64s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEAl5EWyEH8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLiF8PRGevs RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - Mavs2019 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 04:40 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Trae Young had the worst DRPM of the last few years in his first two seasons. As I mentioned in the post above. The sample size is still really small and Richardson ranks among the worst Mavs in overall net rating so far. Mavs are -11.4 with him on the floor. Only one worse is Powell at -12.3. Richardson played a lot of minutes in the bad games early in the season and was out during the recent winning streakDo you have any scientific data to back this up? So in the end you are just guessing after crunching all the numbers. I don´t need to do that to know we´d lose some on defense and gain some on offense with DeRozan, but until it plays out nobody knows whether we´d be a worse or better team overall. RE: ROSTER TALK: Trade/FA Ideas (Mar 25 TDL) + Salary Chart - dirkfansince1998 - 01-15-2021 (01-15-2021, 07:31 PM)Mavs2019 Wrote: Do you have any scientific data to back this up? So in the end you are just guessing after crunching all the numbers. I don´t need to do that to know we´d lose some on defense and gain some on offense with DeRozan, but until it plays out nobody knows whether we´d be a worse or better team overall. As I just stated. Over his entire career he only had a positive net impact once. It´s funny that I am providing the numbers but somehow am the one that is guessing. What exactly are you doing? I haven´t seen anything to support the case for DeRozan from any of his supporters. My case against his offense is build around his on/off numbers as well. They obviously aren´t as bad as his defensive numbers but outside of the 17/18 (+4) season he has a negative offensive on/off as well. If you can provide an explanation for those numbers I would love to hear it. Why are DeRozan´s teams better when he is on the bench? |