![]() |
Luka Dealt to Lakers: Nico Harrison is a Basketball Terrorist - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Luka Dealt to Lakers: Nico Harrison is a Basketball Terrorist (/showthread.php?tid=3630) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - fifteenth - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 12:49 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: This is kind of where I am, too. There was a dream that was Luka. You could only whisper it. Anything more than a whisper and it would vanish, fragile. Great post, Killer. I think you do a great job of acknowledging that "both sides" of this particular discussion makes sense. It's obvious that you've wrestled with both sides. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - fifteenth - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 01:39 PM)mavsmagic Wrote: Long time lurker on this board, but had to reply to this. Seeing fans switch up and buy the narrative the FO is trying to sell is super disappointing. Luka is 25. No superstar had it all together and figured it out at 25. Not even Dirk. Welcome to the board, and keep posting! You are leaving one thing out of your post: I don't think it's debatable that Luka refused to take care of his body. An argument that ignores that Luka's flaws are part of this story is incomplete in my mind. We've been talking about Luka not taking care of himself for like, three years. It's not a new topic. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - fifteenth - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 01:40 PM)hakeemfaan Wrote: .... I noticed that too! Well done, AD. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - fifteenth - 02-09-2025 This discussion, over the last few pages, began to be framed as a "TASTE GREAT," "LESS FILLING" argument. Both can be true. We can criticize the front office and ownership, think Luka is a great player and generational talent, love how Luka brought the team to the cusp of a championship, AND, discuss the fact that refused to learn to take care of himself and that this was a problem. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - DallasMaverick - 02-09-2025 https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/43767909/mavericks-owner-backs-doncic-trade-says-team-relocating Doesn’t look like moving the team was a motivation. Doesn’t look like cheapness was a motivation. Maybe they really, truly thought it was the best basketball decision. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - mvossman - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:03 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/43767909/mavericks-owner-backs-doncic-trade-says-team-relocating This may all be true, but he is not going to come out and say they are trying to move the team, or that he plans on being cheap. Has he commented on why they executed this in the middle of the night without shopping Luka to any other teams? RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - KillerLeft - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:09 PM)mvossman Wrote: Has he commented on why they executed this in the middle of the night without shopping Luka to any other teams? They are practically screaming this reason to us, it's just that we don't want to hear it. And, btw, I'm not convinced the reason is GOOD, but: They wanted to be rid of Luka I think, yes, but another reason this happened, and possibly the MAIN reason it happened NOW, is that they really, really wanted AD. Like, Harrison thinks the team will be BETTER with AD than it would've been with Luka. We don't have to agree, but really getting that through our heads goes a long way to explaining some of this stuff. If he starts a bidding war and Luka's team get wind of things, we start living in a world where Bill Duffy asks "Where do you want to play, Luka," followed by shopping around with those teams to make sure they'll pay up this summer. That's even assuming they don't put it out there that he'll not sign with anyone in attempt to stall this until Dallas has no choice but to SuperMax him or lose him for nothing. But, even if they accept the premise that he's going to get traded, Luka's team has SIGNIFICANTLY more leverage in that situation once this gets leaked, as does Davis/Rich Paul. Would the Mavs have ended up with more return that way? Probably, but maybe not, and I bet they wouldn't have gotten a PLAYER anywhere near the level of Davis, which, again, seems to have been the point. There's a rumor (which I'm inclined to believe) that Luka was offered for Giannis and Milwaukee declined, but past Giannis and AD, we don't even know for sure that Harrison would've even gone through with this trade at all. And, if keeping Luka is even among the possibilities being considered, do you really want to openly shop him? In other words, for a variety of reasons, keeping it secret meant keeping it secret from Luka and his agent. I don't know how many 1sts AD is worth in a vacuum, but I do know that his value cancels out some portion of Luka's. And, getting AD was the point here for the Mavs. Honestly, another pick and maybe a swap added in between and I'm feeling much better by now. I'm not saying they handled this well and we just need to get over it, as I'm sure there were ways to improve on how it went down, but I can understand now, a week later, why an auction wasn't staged. And, while it's annoying to feel they could've gotten more for Luka and didn't push hard enough for it...if Luka is who we think he could be when the dust clears on all of this, this trade will seem ridiculous no matter what was traded for him. If he flames out, Harrison will probably look pretty smart in hindsight for snagging a talent like AD with which to move forward, albeit through a much shorter window. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - RoyTarpleysGhost - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:03 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/43767909/mavericks-owner-backs-doncic-trade-says-team-relocating The people that think this happened so he can move the Mavs to Las Vegas.....are not very bright. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - KillerLeft - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:46 PM)RoyTarpleysGhost Wrote: The people that think this happened so he can move the Mavs to Las Vegas.....are not very bright. For sure. Vegas is tiny. Doesn't compare to Dallas, market size wise. DFW represents a "leveling up" for the Adelsons. They gained experience in the Casino/real estate business in Vegas, probably saw the writing on the wall that gambling would soon be legal in Texas and are attempting to be the first to plant their flag here. My understanding is that they liquidated most of, if not all of their Vegas property to buy the team and get started here. They wanted to come HERE, to the BIGGER market, to be even MORE successful. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - mavsmagic - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 04:14 PM)fifteenth Wrote: Welcome to the board, and keep posting! You are leaving one thing out of your post: I don't think it's debatable that Luka refused to take care of his body. An argument that ignores that Luka's flaws are part of this story is incomplete in my mind. We've been talking about Luka not taking care of himself for like, three years. It's not a new topic. In my second paragraph I acknowledged that he has flaws. No superstar is perfect. Yes there were issues with his conditioning, defense, and whining to refs. But he’s only 25. To completely give up on him this early on and then trash him on the way out is not the way to go. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - Winter - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:42 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: They wanted to be rid of Luka I think, yes, but another reason this happened, and possibly the MAIN reason it happened NOW, is that they really, really wanted AD. This is easily the least talked about thing on this thread. It's almost certainly true. While the weight of basketball skill may lean heavily towards Luka in terms of value, AD is likely the best player for a Mavericks team that no longer has Luka in the starting five. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - BoulderMFFL - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:03 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/43767909/mavericks-owner-backs-doncic-trade-says-team-relocating The SuperSonics is still in Seattle. I have no doubt the Mavs will always stay in Texas, but hopefully not like the SuperSonics. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - KillerLeft - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:52 PM)mavsmagic Wrote: But he’s only 25. To completely give up on him this early on and then trash him on the way out is not the way to go. You might be right about that. A large part of me expects that you are...will be, whatever. It sucks for fans who are attached to him, and despite my recent criticism, I am one of those fans. But, I think you'd be even more mad if they weren't telling us anything about their thinking and he was just gone. And, I think it's really difficult, impossible maybe, to tell us anything about their thinking without making it seem like they're trashing him, given what we know their thinking actually is. What you're really saying is that they shouldn't have traded Luka, and that nothing is going to make you OK with this, at least not for a long time, and I get that. We ALL feel that way, to varying extents, probably even the dudes who just traded him. When Harrison/Kidd came here, they were coming to be part of Luka's career. That was THE draw of this job. It's silly for us to believe they wanted rid of him from the get go. I'm sure this is not where Harrison saw things going on his first day. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - Chicagojk - 02-09-2025 Mark urged Nico not to trade Luka, but was not in the loop. Trade had already been finalized, I believe. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10154211-nba-rumors-mark-cuban-urged-mavs-gm-not-to-trade-luka-doncic-before-lakers-deal RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - Chicagojk - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 06:17 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Mark urged Nico not to trade Luka, but was not in the loop. Trade had already been finalized, I believe. The whole Cuban angle is fascinating. Did he really sell the team with the expectation that he would still run basketball operations? Less than a year he is completely out of the picture and wasn't even consulted on the Luka trade. What a wild ride. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - Winter - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 06:27 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: The whole Cuban angle is fascinating. Did he really sell the team with the expectation that he would still run basketball operations? Less than a year he is completely out of the picture and wasn't even consulted on the Luka trade. What a wild ride. If you really think about it though, why consult Cuban? You just have to convince the owners. I suspect Nico and Dumont knew what Cuban would say. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - mavsmagic - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 06:27 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: The whole Cuban angle is fascinating. Did he really sell the team with the expectation that he would still run basketball operations? Less than a year he is completely out of the picture and wasn't even consulted on the Luka trade. What a wild ride. It’s sad when you think about it, but in a way this is his fault for selling the team in the first place. But I’m sure in his wildest imaginations he never thought Luka would be traded, especially fresh off a finals appearance RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - hakeemfaan - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 05:42 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: They are practically screaming this reason to us, it's just that we don't want to hear it. And, btw, I'm not convinced the reason is GOOD, but: This was mentioned somewhere on this thread or somewhere else on another thread and this is DUMB no matter how many times it is thrown out . There is no other way to say it and as the other poster said it is super annoying for any Mavs fan to even give them a pass on this. This is a loser mentality of thinking which is why other teams always seem to trade away assets and make out like bandits while the Mavs don’t. If the worst case came to pass and they ended up with nothing I would take that chance over what they got. What they got doesn’t move the needle for the team either short term or long term. Why just glibly believe them that they would have paid the supermax to Luka if he was fit as a fiddle. I don’t know enough about this ownership to give them a pass on anything. The owner’s and GM’s lack of maturity is also on display post the trade. An incoming player showing more maturity and class than either of them is all one needs to know. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - HoosierDaddyKid - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 06:00 PM)Winter Wrote: This is easily the least talked about thing on this thread. For the short term, yes. But how long will AD hold up? He's out again with a abductor injury and won't play vs the Kings. That's the $64 dollar question. Lakers traded for Luka long term, and they added his 1st game as a Laker tomorrow night vs the Jazz on ESPN. RE: Luka Dealt to Lakers - KillerLeft - 02-09-2025 (02-09-2025, 07:26 PM)hakeemfaan Wrote: This was mentioned somewhere on this thread or somewhere else on another thread and this is DUMB no matter how many times it is thrown out . There is no other way to say it and as the other poster said it is super annoying for any Mavs fan to even give them a pass on this. This is a loser mentality of thinking which is why other teams always seem to trade away assets and make out like bandits while the Mavs don’t. Trying to understand their thinking isn't remotely close to "giving them a pass." They wanted AD. It's as simple as that. Key word being "they." Guys, if you want nothing but hate, and won't accept anything else, just skip my posts. I have repeatedly said I wouldn't have made this trade, and I'm as upset as the next guy. Attacking me or others who are attempting to move forward and discuss different viewpoints won't make you less angry and won't bring Luka back. |