TDL Archived: The 2nd Rnd Pick Yankee Swap - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: TDL Archived: The 2nd Rnd Pick Yankee Swap (/showthread.php?tid=2150) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
|
RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - Chicagojk - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 08:56 AM)mvossman Wrote: Barrett is young and talented, but in 3 years in the NBA he has been wildly inefficient with a TS% barely over 50%. There is obviously reason to expect him to improve, but he has a long way to go to be worth 30 mil a year. Its hard to see that contract making him appealing in a trade. Yes, Barrett is a difficult eval for me...even going back to college. He is a guy who needs the ball a lot but struggles finishing and is not a great shooter. On the other hand, he has a great build and looks the part on the floor. I wonder how he would look as a second or third option on a really good team. He should also be a good defender so that is another positive. I think in time he winds up a few time all star. But I think he is a odd fit to a lot teams. If the Mavs have no trade brewing (they probably don't), I would be in favor of going a little off the beaten path for the last roster spot. Take a gamble. I am not sure who that is or the size of that gamble, but I would be in favor looking in a different direction than the safe route. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - mvossman - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 10:11 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: He should also be a good defender so that is another positive. I think in time he winds up a few time all star. But I think he is a odd fit to a lot teams. I think to often folks look at a players size and athleticism and assume they will be good defenders. I think there is more to good defense than that, and Barrett has not shown to be a particularly good defender yet. He gives me a Minnesota Wiggins vibe, and I'm not sure if he has Warriors Wiggins in him. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - Hypermav - 08-31-2022 https://twitter.com/TheLaurenGunn/status/1564955151873482754?s=20&t=qMZM5TZQk8RcX0RnWAkdOQ I would do this. I hate to help LA but we get a 23 FRP, 3rd guard and minor DP upgrade. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - Chicagojk - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 12:37 PM)Hypermav Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheLaurenGunn/status/1564955151873482754?s=20&t=qMZM5TZQk8RcX0RnWAkdOQ I would pass. You can probably get McConnell (and his three years left on his contract) for Powell. Theis wouldn't get playing time here and the first is from Boston which will be late. The Mavs would be willing to move Hardaway but if he is here, he is going to get a lot of minutes and will be counted on to score. I don't see how this helps the Mavs this year or moving forward. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - Hypermav - 08-31-2022 I was thinking the 23 FRP gives us all our picks to use when needed. Maybe I am wrong. This was more to set up the next move. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - ItsGoTime - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 01:32 PM)Hypermav Wrote: I was thinking the 23 FRP gives us all our picks to use when needed. Maybe I am wrong. This was more to set up the next move.We would have that pick and then 27 and 29 to trade cause we still could lose the 24 or 25 pick based on the protections on our 23. would be best to go to the draft and convey our own 23, then pick the Bos 23 for the team we're trading with, we then can trade the 24, 26, 28, 30. That's 5 picks to trade for upgrade players using THJ's new value after a good season and Bertans also having a good season and his contract essentially expiring. That's 2 picks (and 2 pick swaps and/or some seconds) for OGA and 3 picks (and 1 pick swap and/or some seconds) for SGA. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - DallasMaverick - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 08:56 AM)mvossman Wrote: Barrett is young and talented, but in 3 years in the NBA he has been wildly inefficient with a TS% barely over 50%. There is obviously reason to expect him to improve, but he has a long way to go to be worth 30 mil a year. Its hard to see that contract making him appealing in a trade. Is RJ Barrett a Russell Westbrook starter kit? RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - mvossman - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 03:02 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Is RJ Barrett a Russell Westbrook starter kit? He can't distribute like Russ can. He is a Wiggins starter kit on a very similar path so far. That would mean in 4 years he might be close to worth his contract. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - DanSchwartzgan - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 12:37 PM)Hypermav Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheLaurenGunn/status/1564955151873482754?s=20&t=qMZM5TZQk8RcX0RnWAkdOQ If you read the Twitter thread she says that Mike Scotto reported that Indy proposed Turner/Hield/Theis for Russ and 27 and 29 and LA turned it down because it didn't want the Theis salary. She's simply trying to build off of something that was apparently on the table (and include the Mav's). Spotrac has Theis as a club option in 24/25, so two guaranteed years left. Even I would trade Powell for two years and an option on Theis. I think he's a better fit for what we are trying to do and we have McGee to play the Powell role (or roll). I think we are getting the Boston pick and the seconds largely as compensation for McConnell vs. THJ. He'd be an expensive third guard who is guaranteed this season and next and $5mm guaranteed in 24/25 (at this rate, seems we are on our way to collecting all the partial guarantees in the league if we did this). The Boston 23 is unprotected which means we can structure a deal to trade our "next" pick since we'd be guaranteed of making a pick in 23. It would be 24 if 23 conveys, plus you do the every other year thing. So, there might be some value to having that Boston pick at the TDL. If we are pretty clearly a playoff team in February a team could take some salary and feel pretty good about getting 24, 26 and 28 plus pick swaps. As IGT points out, it is even more valuable next summer. Remember, we don't have to have our own 23 to trade 24 (or the earliest pick that conveys). We have to have "a" first in one of the next two future drafts. I would do a pick/McConnel for THJ swap. We can replace what THJ does. We need what McConnell does even though he isn't as good. The team building assets are just too strong to pass up. Where I think this breaks down is sending THJ to LA. They don't need both THJ and Hield and if they didn't want Theis's money, why would they take Hardaway's. Would Cleveland take THJ and send LaVert to LA rather than losing LaVert for nothing. That might be a way of fixing the biggest issue I have with her proposal. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - ItsGoTime - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 05:02 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I think we are getting the Boston pick and the seconds largely as compensation for McConnell vs. THJ. He'd be an expensive third guard who is guaranteed this season and next and $5mm guaranteed in 24/25 (at this rate, seems we are on our way to collecting all the partial guarantees in the league if we did this). The Boston 23 is unprotected which means we can structure a deal to trade our "next" pick since we'd be guaranteed of making a pick in 23. It would be 24 if 23 conveys, plus you do the every other year thing. So, there might be some value to having that Boston pick at the TDL. If we are pretty clearly a playoff team in February a team could take some salary and feel pretty good about getting 24, 26 and 28 plus pick swaps. As IGT points out, it is even more valuable next summer. Remember, we don't have to have our own 23 to trade 24 (or the earliest pick that conveys). We have to have "a" first in one of the next two future drafts.At the TDL this year, there is still a chance that the 24 or 25 first conveys to NY so we cannot trade either of those, right? If the 25 conveys, we can’t trade the 26. Unless there’s something I’m missing, I’m pretty sure the way I explained it is correct. At the TDL we can trade the Boston 23 and our 27 and 29. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - mvossman - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 06:14 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: At the TDL this year, there is still a chance that the 24 or 25 first conveys to NY so we cannot trade either of those, right? If the 25 conveys, we can’t trade the 26. Unless there’s something I’m missing, I’m pretty sure the way I explained it is correct. At the TDL we can trade the Boston 23 and our 27 and 29. I think if the Boston 23 is unprotected, then it can take the place of our 23 from the standpoint of the Stepien rule. So after the trade we can immediate trade that pick plus 25, 27, 29 if we wanted. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - ItsGoTime - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 06:51 PM)mvossman Wrote: I think if the Boston 23 is unprotected, then it can take the place of our 23 from the standpoint of the Stepien rule. So after the trade we can immediate trade that pick plus 25, 27, 29 if we wanted.It’s not about Stepien, it’s about the possibility that the pick itself will not be available due to it going to NY. Can’t trade it to NY and another team. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - chaparral - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 12:37 PM)Hypermav Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheLaurenGunn/status/1564955151873482754?s=20&t=qMZM5TZQk8RcX0RnWAkdOQ Doesn't this trade like wipe out all our LT this season? RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - DanSchwartzgan - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 06:14 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: At the TDL this year, there is still a chance that the 24 or 25 first conveys to NY so we cannot trade either of those, right? If the 25 conveys, we can’t trade the 26. Unless there’s something I’m missing, I’m pretty sure the way I explained it is correct. At the TDL we can trade the Boston 23 and our 27 and 29. The terms of the deal can be "next" legally tradeable first. It doesn't have to be designated as 24 or 25. If 23 conveys, the trade partner gets 24 as the starting point for a string of future picks every other year. If 23 doesn't convey, then 25 is the earliest possible pick. At the TDL, teams should have a decent idea where the pick is likely to fall. I agree with your take that the summer provides even greater opportunities. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - F Gump - 08-31-2022 Nothing in this non-trade with LA/IND would enable Dallas to trade any more of their own picks than they can right now. It only offers the Mavs a provisional Boston pick that is likely to convey, but not guaranteed. Also the Stepien Rule (and the workarounds) are being misstated in the conversation. The earliest contingent pick the Mavs could offer of their own would be TWO YEARS after the Stepien limit is satisfied, not the following year. That is, if trading a Mavs' pick before NY is designated to get the Mavs pick in 2023, the pick being conveyed to Team X would have to be stated as "two years after FRP conveys to NY" so no sooner than 2025 and might be as late as 2027. Having, or not having, a provisional BOS 2023 pick would not change that limit, as the trade wording must account for any and every B2B non-1st scenario. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - ItsGoTime - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 08:11 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: The terms of the deal can be "next" legally tradeable first. It doesn't have to be designated as 24 or 25. If 23 conveys, the trade partner gets 24 as the starting point for a string of future picks every other year. If 23 doesn't convey, then 25 is the earliest possible pick. At the TDL, teams should have a decent idea where the pick is likely to fall.In this situation, the “next available pick” could be the 27 first due to the 23 conveying in 25 so the next available pick is the 27. We then couldn’t also trade the 27 in the original trade. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - mvossman - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 08:58 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: In this situation, the “next available pick” could be the 27 first due to the 23 conveying in 25 so the next available pick is the 27. We then couldn’t also trade the 27 in the original trade. I think want Dan is saying is that if you are sending out 3 firsts conditionally on when 23 conveys, then in your scenario we would be sending out 27, 29 and 31. I'm not sure that is a situation either the Mavs or the buyers want, so it really does not make sense to send out a pick until that pick is settled. That means either NY agreeing to remove the protection, or waiting until after next draft (assuming the pick conveys). I would guess that once the pick is known to convey (end of this coming season) we would be able to trade 24, 26, 28 and so on with the understanding that it is not triggered until after the draft (like the Wood trade). Seems like sending out a protected pick can have significant consequences on future asset management. I wonder which team would find it more valuable to remove that protection? New York so they can send another unprotected first in Mitchell trade, or the Mavs so they would have more flexibility to make a big trade now or at the TDL. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - ItsGoTime - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 09:29 PM)mvossman Wrote: I think want Dan is saying is that if you are sending out 3 firsts conditionally on when 23 conveys, then in your scenario we would be sending out 27, 29 and 31.I could be wrong, but I think the last pick available to trade is the 29. If that is the case, I doubt the league would approve of language that has the chance to trade a later than 29 pick. Otherwise, we could send the next 10 available picks to NJ for KD. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - DanSchwartzgan - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 08:24 PM)F Gump Wrote: Nothing in this non-trade with LA/IND would enable Dallas to trade any more of their own picks than they can right now. It only offers the Mavs a provisional Boston pick that is likely to convey, but not guaranteed. Tankathon has the Boston pick as unprotected. If such a trade were made, Dallas would be guaranteed a pick in the 2023 draft. The rule is that a team can't be without two consecutive future firsts. It doesn't have to be their own future firsts. Trading the 24 pick is not a violation if the Dallas pick conveys to NY in 23. Trading 25 is a problem if 23 doesn't convey because Dallas can't trade 24 and 25. RE: TRADE & FA: UTA motivated to deal Donovan before camp - F Gump - 08-31-2022 (08-31-2022, 09:44 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Tankathon has the Boston pick as unprotected. 2023 first round draft pick to Indiana Boston's 2023 1st round pick to Indiana protected for selections 1-12; if this pick falls within its protected range and is therefore not conveyed, then Boston will instead convey Dallas' 2023 2nd round pick, Miami's 2023 2nd round pick or Houston's 2023 2nd round pick (see Boston Incoming) to Indiana [Boston-Indiana, 7/9/2022] |