MavsBoard
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620


RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-01-2025

(07-01-2025, 10:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: If Brad Beal gets bought out AND he would like to come to the Mavs on a buyout, do the Mavs want him?

Can't speak for the Mavs, but I certainly don't. 

Honestly, if they're not going to trade Gafford and/or PJW for someone real, I'm just hopeful they can add Exum and go to war.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - Knutsen - 07-01-2025

(07-01-2025, 09:58 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I don't know, man. It sounds good in some ways, but he'll be 35, coming off of an Achilles injury. And, I really don't think he and Kyrie can play together, do you?

I mean, if it's a TWO YEAR DEAL (not a 1+1 that he can opt out of if his rehab is going well) at the MINIMUM, you have to do it, but I think some desperate team is going to do better than that, and the Mavs literally can't. They'd have to dump a player (easier said than done) just to offer him a minimum, and we already think they need to do that in order to sign Exum to help THIS season.

What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract?


RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-01-2025

(07-01-2025, 10:33 PM)Knutsen Wrote: What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract?

Good question. I think it's the latter, but I'm not the cap rules guy around here at all. Dan or FGump or Smitty or SH probably know.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - SleepingHero - 07-01-2025

(07-01-2025, 10:33 PM)Knutsen Wrote: What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract?

1) Yes. Lillard's money will be additive. He signed a guaranteed contract, so he will be given ALL the money he signed for. If this was a buyout, that'd be a different story. But even if Lillard signed elsewhere, the money he gets from the Bucks will remain.

And 2) As I understand it. Yes, this does affect the cap-charge the Bucks would be affected by if Lillard signed elsewhere, but it won't be by much.

There is a rule called "Set-Off" in the CBA. Before we begin, the Set-Off only affects how much the waiving team pays the player. It DOES NOT reduce the cap hit, UNLESS this waived player was also stretched. And finally, it only can apply to guaranteed money (obviously right? Because if it was non-guaranteed, it never counted in the first place!).

Okay so the formula for the "set-off" provision is as follows: 50% of the DIFFERENCE between the waived player's new salary and the minimum salary, but only if the NEW salary exceeds the minimum (e.g., if Dame signs elsewhere for the vet min, this provision does not apply). 

Now the "set-off" provision when applied to a stretched-waived player affects the total guaranteed salary he was waived for, not the per-year cap hit the Bucks are paying.

Right, so,  the Bucks waived $112,583,016 of the last 2 years of Dame's contract. With the stretch-waive, we take 2 years left X 2=  4 + 1= 5 years cap charge. Thus this 112 mil over 5 years works out to be $22,516,603. That is the per year cap charge of dead money the Bucks will be paying. 

Now for the set off:

Lets say Lillard signs elsewhere for 10mil starting salary. The formula for the setoff is 50% the difference between the new salary and Lillard's minimum. So 10mil-3.6mil(vet min)= 6.4. Now we divide that by 2 which gives us 3.2 mil.  

Thus the "set-off" applied will be 3.2 mil to the TOTAL amount waived by the Bucks. Which brings the new S/W number to $109,383,016.  

Now we re-apply the S/W calculation: 109/5 gives us a new cap charge of $21,876,603. This means the Bucks will save a whopping 640k a year. 

So yes, there will be a reduction, but at this scale it's basically a rounding error. 

This "Set-Off" provision matters more on smaller S/W deals, such as McGee where the cap hit is 2.2 mil, but again it's nothing to really factor in. Now if Lillard signs another star level deal like 30 mil a year, now the Bucks can see some real savings (~$19,876,603 vs the current amount of $22,516,603). But that's kind of unrealistic for a 35 year old guard coming off an achilles injury.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - SleepingHero - 07-01-2025

(07-01-2025, 10:30 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Can't speak for the Mavs, but I certainly don't. 

Honestly, if they're not going to trade Gafford and/or PJW for someone real, I'm just hopeful they can add Exum and go to war.

Interesting. Even if Beal were to sign a vet min deal hypothetically?

Obviously he'd be angling for an MLE level deal from somewhere, so we're already venturing into the realm of improbability. But lets ignore that and focus on just the idea of Beal coming here for a vet min deal as is.

Would we not want that? Beal sucks at almost 60mil a year. Beal in the price range of Powell/OMax/etc. is a massive steal is it not?


RE: MAVS NEWS: - mvossman - 07-02-2025

(07-01-2025, 11:55 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: Interesting. Even if Beal were to sign a vet min deal hypothetically?

Obviously he'd be angling for an MLE level deal from somewhere, so we're already venturing into the realm of improbability. But lets ignore that and focus on just the idea of Beal coming here for a vet min deal as is.

Would we not want that? Beal sucks at almost 60mil a year. Beal in the price range of Powell/OMax/etc. is a massive steal is it not?

He would probably be in the ballpark of DLo (assuming his continued steady decline and Dlo bounce back).  That would certainly be value at vet min, but not enough to move the needle on this teams outlook.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - RasheedsBigWhiteSpot - 07-02-2025

(07-01-2025, 10:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: If Brad Beal gets bought out AND he would like to come to the Mavs on a buyout, do the Mavs want him?

Hell yeah. His problem is his contract. The Mavs DESPERATELY need shooting. If you can get a 16-18+ point 3 point shooter on a vet minimum contract, YOU DO IT!!!


RE: MAVS NEWS: - DallasMaverick - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 10:55 AM)RasheedsBigWhiteSpot Wrote: Hell yeah. His problem is his contract. The Mavs DESPERATELY need shooting. If you can get a 16-18+ point 3 point shooter on a vet minimum contract, YOU DO IT!!!

Timmy!!!


RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025

Mavs posted pictures of players working out at facility

https://x.com/dallasmavs/status/1940410448194777203/photo/4

https://x.com/dallasmavs/status/1940410469988385018


RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025

Mavs PR
@MavsPR
·
9m
The Dallas Mavericks announced today that they have signed first overall pick forward Cooper Flagg.

Per team policy, terms of the deal were not disclosed.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - RasheedsBigWhiteSpot - 07-02-2025

Dinwiddie signed by Hornets. Instantly jacks up a 3.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45647470/sources-hornets-free-agent-spencer-dinwiddie-reach-deal


RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 02:14 PM)RasheedsBigWhiteSpot Wrote: Dinwiddie signed by Hornets.  Instantly jacks up a 3.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45647470/sources-hornets-free-agent-spencer-dinwiddie-reach-deal

Fantastic news.

One of the lowest basketball IQ in the league... D-Lo is a genius compared to him.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025

(07-01-2025, 06:39 PM)Smitty Wrote: REPORT: The Dallas Mavericks are expected to extend Jason Kidd’s contract before the 2025-26 season begins, per @TheSteinLine

Everytime the timing is atrocius.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025

(07-01-2025, 04:23 PM)mvossman Wrote: I really like the idea of AD at the 5, PJ at the 4 and Flagg at the 3.  When Kyrie comes back at the 1, all it needs is a legit 2 way SG to be a contender.  Too bad with the current roster construction its more often going to be a center.

This is a good post, i'm agree with you.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025

Exum back. I guess another move is tbd


Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
Free agent guard Dante Exum has agreed to a one-year deal to return to the Dallas Mavericks, sources tell ESPN. Exum considered two other contenders but returns to Dallas to share ball-handling duties to start the season with D'Angelo Russell.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 03:16 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Exum back.  I guess another move is tbd


Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
Free agent guard Dante Exum has agreed to a one-year deal to return to the Dallas Mavericks, sources tell ESPN. Exum considered two other contenders but returns to Dallas to share ball-handling duties to start the season with D'Angelo Russell.

We need him more than Hardy and Powell for sure.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - DanSchwartzgan - 07-02-2025

I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now.  Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago.

Legler commented that he thought Dallas might make its BIG move next season instead of this season.  Get Kyrie back, see how he is and decide what you need.  Not a terrible theory.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - Jmaciscool - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 03:27 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now.  Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago.

Legler commented that he thought Dallas might make its BIG move next season instead of this season.  Get Kyrie back, see how he is and decide what you need.  Not a terrible theory.

Makes sense to me.  I'd prefer no big moves until we see what we have to know what we need.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 03:27 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now.  Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago.

Legler commented that he thought Dallas might make its BIG move next season instead of this season.  Get Kyrie back, see how he is and decide what you need.  Not a terrible theory.

Yes, because this season we have no chances to contend.

Even Harrison knows it despite what he said... I told you guys million times. He is not stupid.

Flagg needs time and street clothes is a good Catwoman.


RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-02-2025

(07-02-2025, 03:16 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Exum back.  I guess another move is tbd


Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
Free agent guard Dante Exum has agreed to a one-year deal to return to the Dallas Mavericks, sources tell ESPN. Exum considered two other contenders but returns to Dallas to share ball-handling duties to start the season with D'Angelo Russell.

This is pretty huge. 

I hope it's not just a simple waiving of Williams, and there's something better coming to clear the way (without involving a pick).