![]() |
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
|
RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 10:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: If Brad Beal gets bought out AND he would like to come to the Mavs on a buyout, do the Mavs want him? Can't speak for the Mavs, but I certainly don't. Honestly, if they're not going to trade Gafford and/or PJW for someone real, I'm just hopeful they can add Exum and go to war. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Knutsen - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 09:58 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I don't know, man. It sounds good in some ways, but he'll be 35, coming off of an Achilles injury. And, I really don't think he and Kyrie can play together, do you? What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract? RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 10:33 PM)Knutsen Wrote: What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract? Good question. I think it's the latter, but I'm not the cap rules guy around here at all. Dan or FGump or Smitty or SH probably know. RE: MAVS NEWS: - SleepingHero - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 10:33 PM)Knutsen Wrote: What are the stretch provision specific rules for these next two seasons - is anything he earns additive to the big Bucks (pun intended) he‘ll get from Milwaukee or does it just lower the bill of the Bucks and Lillard gets the same money no matter if he signs a minimum deal or a bigger contract? 1) Yes. Lillard's money will be additive. He signed a guaranteed contract, so he will be given ALL the money he signed for. If this was a buyout, that'd be a different story. But even if Lillard signed elsewhere, the money he gets from the Bucks will remain. And 2) As I understand it. Yes, this does affect the cap-charge the Bucks would be affected by if Lillard signed elsewhere, but it won't be by much. There is a rule called "Set-Off" in the CBA. Before we begin, the Set-Off only affects how much the waiving team pays the player. It DOES NOT reduce the cap hit, UNLESS this waived player was also stretched. And finally, it only can apply to guaranteed money (obviously right? Because if it was non-guaranteed, it never counted in the first place!). Okay so the formula for the "set-off" provision is as follows: 50% of the DIFFERENCE between the waived player's new salary and the minimum salary, but only if the NEW salary exceeds the minimum (e.g., if Dame signs elsewhere for the vet min, this provision does not apply). Now the "set-off" provision when applied to a stretched-waived player affects the total guaranteed salary he was waived for, not the per-year cap hit the Bucks are paying. Right, so, the Bucks waived $112,583,016 of the last 2 years of Dame's contract. With the stretch-waive, we take 2 years left X 2= 4 + 1= 5 years cap charge. Thus this 112 mil over 5 years works out to be $22,516,603. That is the per year cap charge of dead money the Bucks will be paying. Now for the set off: Lets say Lillard signs elsewhere for 10mil starting salary. The formula for the setoff is 50% the difference between the new salary and Lillard's minimum. So 10mil-3.6mil(vet min)= 6.4. Now we divide that by 2 which gives us 3.2 mil. Thus the "set-off" applied will be 3.2 mil to the TOTAL amount waived by the Bucks. Which brings the new S/W number to $109,383,016. Now we re-apply the S/W calculation: 109/5 gives us a new cap charge of $21,876,603. This means the Bucks will save a whopping 640k a year. So yes, there will be a reduction, but at this scale it's basically a rounding error. This "Set-Off" provision matters more on smaller S/W deals, such as McGee where the cap hit is 2.2 mil, but again it's nothing to really factor in. Now if Lillard signs another star level deal like 30 mil a year, now the Bucks can see some real savings (~$19,876,603 vs the current amount of $22,516,603). But that's kind of unrealistic for a 35 year old guard coming off an achilles injury. RE: MAVS NEWS: - SleepingHero - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 10:30 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Can't speak for the Mavs, but I certainly don't. Interesting. Even if Beal were to sign a vet min deal hypothetically? Obviously he'd be angling for an MLE level deal from somewhere, so we're already venturing into the realm of improbability. But lets ignore that and focus on just the idea of Beal coming here for a vet min deal as is. Would we not want that? Beal sucks at almost 60mil a year. Beal in the price range of Powell/OMax/etc. is a massive steal is it not? RE: MAVS NEWS: - mvossman - 07-02-2025 (07-01-2025, 11:55 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: Interesting. Even if Beal were to sign a vet min deal hypothetically? He would probably be in the ballpark of DLo (assuming his continued steady decline and Dlo bounce back). That would certainly be value at vet min, but not enough to move the needle on this teams outlook. RE: MAVS NEWS: - RasheedsBigWhiteSpot - 07-02-2025 (07-01-2025, 10:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: If Brad Beal gets bought out AND he would like to come to the Mavs on a buyout, do the Mavs want him? Hell yeah. His problem is his contract. The Mavs DESPERATELY need shooting. If you can get a 16-18+ point 3 point shooter on a vet minimum contract, YOU DO IT!!! RE: MAVS NEWS: - DallasMaverick - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 10:55 AM)RasheedsBigWhiteSpot Wrote: Hell yeah. His problem is his contract. The Mavs DESPERATELY need shooting. If you can get a 16-18+ point 3 point shooter on a vet minimum contract, YOU DO IT!!! Timmy!!! RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025 Mavs posted pictures of players working out at facility https://x.com/dallasmavs/status/1940410448194777203/photo/4 https://x.com/dallasmavs/status/1940410469988385018 RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025 Mavs PR @MavsPR · 9m The Dallas Mavericks announced today that they have signed first overall pick forward Cooper Flagg. Per team policy, terms of the deal were not disclosed. RE: MAVS NEWS: - RasheedsBigWhiteSpot - 07-02-2025 Dinwiddie signed by Hornets. Instantly jacks up a 3. https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45647470/sources-hornets-free-agent-spencer-dinwiddie-reach-deal RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 02:14 PM)RasheedsBigWhiteSpot Wrote: Dinwiddie signed by Hornets. Instantly jacks up a 3. Fantastic news. One of the lowest basketball IQ in the league... D-Lo is a genius compared to him. RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025 (07-01-2025, 06:39 PM)Smitty Wrote: REPORT: The Dallas Mavericks are expected to extend Jason Kidd’s contract before the 2025-26 season begins, per @TheSteinLine Everytime the timing is atrocius. RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025 (07-01-2025, 04:23 PM)mvossman Wrote: I really like the idea of AD at the 5, PJ at the 4 and Flagg at the 3. When Kyrie comes back at the 1, all it needs is a legit 2 way SG to be a contender. Too bad with the current roster construction its more often going to be a center. This is a good post, i'm agree with you. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 07-02-2025 Exum back. I guess another move is tbd Shams Charania @ShamsCharania Free agent guard Dante Exum has agreed to a one-year deal to return to the Dallas Mavericks, sources tell ESPN. Exum considered two other contenders but returns to Dallas to share ball-handling duties to start the season with D'Angelo Russell. RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 03:16 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Exum back. I guess another move is tbd We need him more than Hardy and Powell for sure. RE: MAVS NEWS: - DanSchwartzgan - 07-02-2025 I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now. Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago. Legler commented that he thought Dallas might make its BIG move next season instead of this season. Get Kyrie back, see how he is and decide what you need. Not a terrible theory. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Jmaciscool - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 03:27 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now. Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago. Makes sense to me. I'd prefer no big moves until we see what we have to know what we need. RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 03:27 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I heard something I hadn't seen anywhere on ESPN clip just now. Nico signed DLo for Nike out of Ohio State 10 years ago. Yes, because this season we have no chances to contend. Even Harrison knows it despite what he said... I told you guys million times. He is not stupid. Flagg needs time and street clothes is a good Catwoman. RE: MAVS NEWS: - KillerLeft - 07-02-2025 (07-02-2025, 03:16 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Exum back. I guess another move is tbd This is pretty huge. I hope it's not just a simple waiving of Williams, and there's something better coming to clear the way (without involving a pick). |