![]() |
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
|
RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 06-11-2025 (06-11-2025, 07:39 AM)Winter Wrote: Here's a good 40 minute video on the Mavs from the guys at "Game Theory" I hope Gafford gets more than that. Yuck. Lavert is a good player, but just not sure he is good enough to get real minutes for this team. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-11-2025 (06-11-2025, 04:45 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: I hope Gafford gets more than that. Yuck. Lavert is a good player, but just not sure he is good enough to get real minutes for this team. I can't imagine a scenario where all you get for Gaff is Lavert, not to mention he's more of a SF than SG. This team needs a guard who can guard. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Winter - 06-11-2025 (06-11-2025, 04:54 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: I can't imagine a scenario where all you get for Gaff is Lavert, not to mention he's more of a SF than SG. The trade is not Gafford for Lavert. The trade was originally, Gafford and Atlanta's 1st round pick (#22) for Lavert, but later the two podcasters decided it would be more likely a possibility with Atlanta offering 2 2nd round picks. This is not even a rumor. These guys are just spitballing. It's unlikely as a reasonable idea for several reasons - one being that according to a report today, Atlanta would like to keep Lavert. Lavert is listed as a SG in the the Hawks lineup. He can switch, but he's technically playing behind Daniels... getting 28-31 MPG. Statistically, he's a well-rounded veteran player. You'd be trading a backup center for a backup guard + picks, so there's nothing wrong the idea of that trade. I'm ambivalent about Lavert, so this matters not at all to me. What I found more interesting is that the podcasters thought there were several teams with multiple avenues of trading Gafford (and PJ) for productive guards. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 06-11-2025 Has anyone brought up Ayu from the Bulls? Good size and 25 years old. Going into the last season of a deal at 7 million. Chicago has White going into his last year and Giddey as a free agent. Would Gafford and Hardy or OMAx get you Lonzo and Ayu? I am not very familiar with has game but he is a pretty good sized guard. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-11-2025 (06-11-2025, 05:14 PM)Winter Wrote: The trade is not Gafford for Lavert. The trade was originally, Gafford and Atlanta's 1st round pick (#22) for Lavert, but later the two podcasters decided it would be more likely a possibility with Atlanta offering 2 2nd round picks. This is not even a rumor. These guys are just spitballing. It's unlikely as a reasonable idea for several reasons - one being that according to a report today, Atlanta would like to keep Lavert. Gotcha. We don't have a starting caliber PG on the roster with Kidd's penchant to play Kyrie off the ball. In essence, Kyrie is a combo. Types of guard we need: -Young Defensive Stud (like Dyson, but gettable) or -Starting Veteran 2-way Combo (like Jrue, but younger and cheaper) or -Starting Veteran Pure PG (like Darius, but cheaper) or -Veteran who would be in a 8 Man Rotation (like Lonzo) RE: MAVS NEWS: - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-11-2025 (06-11-2025, 05:52 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Has anyone brought up Ayu from the Bulls? Good size and 25 years old. Going into the last season of a deal at 7 million. Chicago has White going into his last year and Giddey as a free agent. Would Gafford and Hardy or OMAx get you Lonzo and Ayu? I am not very familiar with has game but he is a pretty good sized guard. Ayo's D is pretty bad, especially given his size. Lack of lateral quickness? RE: MAVS NEWS: - F Gump - 06-12-2025 (06-10-2025, 11:08 AM)loki Wrote: Maybe Kidd is taking that approach, but I think that hurts the organization. The Mavs are about to bring their future #1 pick in for another visit. They're trying to hire assistant coaches. They need to re-sign Kyrie when he opts out. They'll also be looking at the free agent market trying to bring in guard help. I don't think Kidd has done, or is doing, a single thing to drive this. People are jabbering, not him. . Nor do I think he has any need to speak to the nonsense. He's under contract, and he's working at his job -- what else is needed? This is all NY media on a slow news day imo, fueled a bit by a mentally challenged Mavs FO who had no clue what to do to kill the story and was too passive. There's no indication Kidd has any desire to get involved, and in fact lots of facts to the contrary, for those who care to notice. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Knutsen - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 09:29 AM)F Gump Wrote: I don't think Kidd has done, or is doing, a single thing to drive this. People are jabbering, not him. . Nor do I think he has any need to speak to the nonsense. He's under contract, and he's working at his job -- what else is needed? Kidd is just being smart and enjoys reading his name in national media to rise the value of his next contract. I understand that the Knicks as a franchise and their team around Brunson in the weaker conference could be attractive to him, but on the other hand Dallas is a fail-safe job for the next years because the fault will always be Nico‘s and deservedly so. RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 06-12-2025 No Harrison = No Kidd. That's the point for me. RE: MAVS NEWS: - F Gump - 06-12-2025 I don't see Kidd and Nico as a package deal at all. I dont think Kidd sees himself as a Nico guy -- Nico is merely his boss doing that job. I see Nico as the Mavs BIGGEST problem by far, and Kidd as part of the solution both now and later. In fact, I think Kidd has great potential to keep the Mavs desirable for players despite Idiot Nico being here acting stupid. RE: MAVS NEWS: - michaeltex - 06-12-2025 Maybe this is a simplistic take, but I feel like, as long as Cuban was active, Kidd sort of had a buffer between Nico and himself. Or at least Nico realized there was a power dynamic between the two that didn't go through him. So he sort of had a governor on his actions to at least check in with the other MBT members before pursuing a decision. But that changed after Cubes sold of his majority stake and the new owners decided they didn't really need his involvement in team management anymore. Then you had Luka's lost training camp and the crappy start to the season, which fed into a narrative that let Nico justify THE TRADE. Along the way he showed Kidd who is really making decisions now, so Jason was now supposed to just shut up and coach. FWIW, I think the fanbase reaction, the press reaction and the AD injury situation have conspired to pinch off Nico's power play. A kneejerk decision without considering the consequences isn't a good look for a contending NBA team. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 02:56 PM)michaeltex Wrote: Maybe this is a simplistic take, but I feel like, as long as Cuban was active, Kidd sort of had a buffer between Nico and himself. Or at least Nico realized there was a power dynamic between the two that didn't go through him. So he sort of had a governor on his actions to at least check in with the other MBT members before pursuing a decision. Astute RE: MAVS NEWS: - FireNicoHarrison - 06-12-2025 Luckily we are not a contending team so... RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 06-13-2025 funny looking back. Back then it was thought Dallas didn't have assets. Ha. Looking back there would have been several teams who either should have taken Haliburtan or taken the Mavs offer. ******************* HALIBURTON COULD HAVE been a Dallas Maverick. The Mavericks had Haliburton as the No.1 player on their 2020 draft board, based in large part on Voulgaris' analytics models. Sources told ESPN that the Mavericks dangled their two selections, No. 18 and No. 31, as well as their sometimes starter and sometimes sixth-man guard Jalen Brunson, to every team until Haliburton went off the board at No. 12 to the Sacramento Kings. "We tried like hell to get him and move up, we just couldn't do it," Carlisle said before the start of the Finals. "When I tell you that Mark Cuban tried everything. When Mark puts his mind to something, he can usually figure something out." The Mavericks never found a suitor, but Carlisle remained a fan of Haliburton's game from afar through the start of the point guard's career. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Nowitzki Way - 06-13-2025 (06-13-2025, 08:20 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: funny looking back. Back then it was thought Dallas didn't have assets. Ha. Looking back there would have been several teams who either should have taken Haliburtan or taken the Mavs offer. I knew we wanted him, never knew we offered that package with Brunson. Like you said, i bet everyone of those teams in the top 11 are kicking themselves for not taking Haliburton or simply trading for Brunson plus 18 (which could have been Tyrese Maxey or Desmond Bane for a good drafting team). Well everyone except the T-Wolves. They are probably happy with Edwards over any of that. Funny to see the Knicks there at 8. They must not have loved Brunson in 2020 like they did in 2022. RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 06-14-2025 https://x.com/All_Things_Mavs/status/1933933961018753216 RE: MAVS NEWS: - khaled1987 - 06-15-2025 (06-13-2025, 01:20 PM)Nowitzki Way Wrote: I knew we wanted him, never knew we offered that package with Brunson. Like you said, i bet everyone of those teams in the top 11 are kicking themselves for not taking Haliburton or simply trading for Brunson plus 18 (which could have been Tyrese Maxey or Desmond Bane for a good drafting team). The Suns must feel the worst. They declined the deal, to get a guy who would have been available at 18 anyway, and he was out of the team in a year and half. They ruined it for us and themselves RE: MAVS NEWS: - Chicagojk - 06-15-2025 Really enjoyable watching pros workout. Here is klay. https://youtu.be/3VgyT1QUzD4?si=f8iZwUcrsnVTWm7j Also Stein says Sweeney is getting interest with the Spurs, Dudley with the cavs and grizzlies and shamgod has also got some interest. Anything to read that our assistants are interviewing for other assistant jobs? RE: MAVS NEWS: - david75090 - 06-15-2025 As with those trying to sell Mavs tickets by phone, it can't be all that much fun working for a toxic organization. RE: MAVS NEWS: - DanSchwartzgan - 06-16-2025 I'm still struggling with what I think is best regarding Gafford/PJ. I see 3 versions of this: 1. Extend and Keep both. This maximizes and retains talent, but doesn't give you much in the way of assets to go after a guard. 2. Keep Gafford and trade PJ Here you are more insulated from injuries to Lively or AD. I think Gafford may be easier to retain on a more reasonable extension. We still have plenty of players to play the 3/4 and Flagg slots more naturally to the starting 3 spot with some minutes at the four. One risk is you may be selling low in PJ. 3. Keep PJ and trade Gafford PJ will finish games. Gafford won't. So, you keep the best player. Between AD, Lively and presumably Jones, you have enough bodies who can play center (hopefully). But, the starting lineup is awkward trying to make PJ, Flagg and AD work without forcing AD into the starting center role. I think I can make a compelling argument for any of these, but what I don't know is how do you fill the guard hole in the roster. I can suppose certain players 'should' be available to us in each scenario for what we have to offer. But, what is ACTUALLY available to us goes a long way in helping me decide which is the better scenario. The legality of trades also plays a role and to determine that, you have to know the plan with Kyrie. |