MavsBoard
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - Mavs2021 - 07-16-2022

I don´t get the line of thinking.

You overpay Powell and McGee by a combined $8M per year, that means you can give Brunson $28M a year and you still have the same outcome.

You have a chance that a 25 year old Brunson elevates his game to another level and earn his "overpay". There is no way Powell or McGee were EVER living up to their contract, the moment they signed it.

Overpaying for minimum level players with NO upside is the absolute worst.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - Kammrath - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 01:29 PM)cow Wrote: I'm still not sure what to think of the mid-tier contracts.  I think I'd rather just have max deals (Luka), bargain deals (DFS, Maxi, Bullock) and low end veteran deals (McGee) than I would mid level deals (THJ, Brunson) but that's in an ideal world with options and Mavs usually don't have a lot of those.


This is the way to go.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - cow - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 01:59 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: I don´t get the line of thinking.

You overpay Powell and McGee by a combined $8M per year, that means you can give Brunson $28M a year and you still have the same outcome.

You have a chance that a 25 year old Brunson elevates his game to another level and earn his "overpay". There is no way Powell or McGee were EVER living up to their contract, the moment they signed it.

Overpaying for minimum level players with NO upside is the absolute worst.

McGee earned $5m last year and had interest from the Bucks at the salary level we offered him but went with us because he tacked on a year.  Giving him $5.5-6m a year isn't an overpay but I do share the concern about the length of the deal, especially the final year.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - mvossman - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 01:29 PM)cow Wrote: The problem as I see it is that NBA front offices tend to chase trends and you'll get overpays on positions or skillsets that quickly become regrettable.  Most recently it happened with one dimensional shooters (Bertans, Harris, Robinson) because NBA offense became all about the three.  Oddly enough we bucked that trend with Curry only to trade him away and later end up with one of those horrible contracts.  You can also get the perfect storm of a large salary cap bump and severely average players getting massive paydays off of a career year.  Look at our very own Ian Mahimni and contracts signed around the same time as the perfect example  

With JB, you probably want to err on the side of an overpay for a lot of reasons.  Even if his upside is limited, he's not one dimensional and he always puts the work in to improve and then improves.  And as we saw, the likelihood of a return on our investment in him was slim to none and of course we got none.  Dallas typically has to outbid teams in dollars or years (McGee) to get them here.  

I posted about this before but I'm still not sure what to think of the mid-tier contracts.  I think I'd rather just have max deals (Luka), bargain deals (DFS, Maxi, Bullock) and low end veteran deals (McGee) than I would mid level deals (THJ, Brunson) but that's in an ideal world with options and Mavs usually don't have a lot of those.

I agree with this to an extent, but its hard to find enough offense under that model.  Guys that can get you 15 or more a game are going to cost mid-tier money.  There are also a scarcity of max contracts and some are not much better than mid-tier (Tobias, KP, Hayward).  Unless you can get three legit maxes, you are probably going to have to go with one or two of the mid tier guys.  What I will say, is that your mid tier contracts should not be guys that cannot create at a high level for themselves or others.  Guys like Timmy, Fournier, Powell are not the kind of player you want to spend mid tier money on.  Somebody like Dinwiddie who can score and distribution at a high level, or Wood who can create for himself make more sense.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - cow - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 03:26 PM)mvossman Wrote: I agree with this to an extent, but its hard to find enough offense under that model.  Guys that can get you 15 or more a game are going to cost mid-tier money.  There are also a scarcity of max contracts and some are not much better than mid-tier (Tobias, KP, Hayward).  Unless you can get three legit maxes, you are probably going to have to go with one or two of the mid tier guys.  What I will say, is that your mid tier contracts should not be guys that cannot create at a high level for themselves or others.  Guys like Timmy, Fournier, Powell are not the kind of player you want to spend mid tier money on.  Somebody like Dinwiddie who can score and distribution at a high level, or Wood who can create for himself make more sense.

Agreed.  I touched on it a little bit at the end of my post.  We aren't in the catbird seat and beggars can't be choosers.  I don't love the contract that Jalen got and to keep him, I'm assuming we'd have to raise those numbers significantly.  Even at that, I don't think you'd turn him into a negative assets, maybe neutral at worst and certainly not the level of Tobias Harris (good players, grossly overpaid).


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - hakeemfaan - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 01:29 PM)cow Wrote: The problem as I see it is that NBA front offices tend to chase trends and you'll get overpays on positions or skillsets that quickly become regrettable.  Most recently it happened with one dimensional shooters (Bertans, Harris, Robinson) because NBA offense became all about the three.  Oddly enough we bucked that trend with Curry only to trade him away and later end up with one of those horrible contracts.  You can also get the perfect storm of a large salary cap bump and severely average players getting massive paydays off of a career year.  Look at our very own Ian Mahimni and contracts signed around the same time as the perfect example  

With JB, you probably want to err on the side of an overpay for a lot of reasons.  Even if his upside is limited, he's not one dimensional and he always puts the work in to improve and then improves.  And as we saw, the likelihood of a return on our investment in him was slim to none and of course we got none.  Dallas typically has to outbid teams in dollars or years (McGee) to get them here.  

I posted about this before but I'm still not sure what to think of the mid-tier contracts.  I think I'd rather just have max deals (Luka), bargain deals (DFS, Maxi, Bullock) and low end veteran deals (McGee) than I would mid level deals (THJ, Brunson) but that's in an ideal world with options and Mavs usually don't have a lot of those.

Most teams that win titles have two legit studs. So you have to pay accordingly.  If you don’t then you have to hit on studs who got locked in to lesser contracts. 

I have ragged on Cuban for his stinginess.  Honestly that is not who I am as a person.  I have never told another man how to spend his money. Even if it is the owner of my fav team.  He bought the team. He gets to decide how he wants to spend money. My issue is Cuban’s delusion. If he just admitted that he can’t keep up with the Balmers of this world, and ran it like a small market team with a lot of emphasis on scouting, hoarding picks, trading players one year early if they know they don’t want to get into a bidding war, I would fully be on board with it. 

The issue with Cuban though is that he is neither here nor there. He still thinks of himself as a big spender and that is why a neophyte GM was hired purely to recruit another star.  The correct thing would have been to hire a GM who can identify bargains and talent and grind behind the scenes. However that is not appealing to Cuban. So the franchise too is neither here nor there. That’s what has been happening since our title.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Kidd: McGee & SD to start | CW off bench | Lawson Deal incoming? - cow - 07-16-2022

(07-16-2022, 04:26 PM)hakeemfaan Wrote: The issue with Cuban though is that he is neither here nor there. He still thinks of himself as a big spender and that is why a neophyte GM was hired purely to recruit another star.  The correct thing would have been to hire a GM who can identify bargains and talent and grind behind the scenes. However that is not appealing to Cuban. So the franchise too is neither here nor there. That’s what has been happening since our title.

Hiring Nico might be a great decision down the line but it was way too risky considering what he knew he had with Luka.  If and when Luka walks, that's going to be one of the bullet pointed reasons.  Winning in 2011 might have been the best and worst thing for this franchise.  Beyond happy for Dirk but it also validated Cuban's believe of being the smartest guy in the room.  He hasn't evolved from how he operated business in the 00s and all the innovation he brought has far been surpassed by other ownership groups.  I also think the average competency of front offices has skyrocketed so you have less suckers to take advantage of and by a lot of indicators, we are now the suckers.  You are also dead on about not needing to spend like the Ballmers of the world but that's why you need to be so successful in every other aspect of talent acquisition.  We are basically the anthesis of GSW who does everything well and spends a fortune.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - Kammrath - 07-17-2022

https://twitter.com/nbabet/status/1548409404482940930

Last year the Vegas line was 48.5 wins....down 1 win to 47.5 wins right now and 7th in the West.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 07:50 AM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/nbabet/status/1548409404482940930

Last year the Vegas line was 48.5 wins....down 1 win to 47.5 wins right now and 7th in the West.


Kinda early for these forecasts, especially when the Durant, Mitchell, Irving drama hasn't been settled.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - ItsGoTime - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 08:22 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Kinda early for these forecasts, especially when the Durant, Mitchell, Irving drama hasn't been settled.
Bettors want to bet now, not when the dust settles!


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - DanSchwartzgan - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 07:50 AM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/nbabet/status/1548409404482940930

Last year the Vegas line was 48.5 wins....down 1 win to 47.5 wins right now and 7th in the West.

I’ll take the over.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - BigDirk41 - 07-17-2022

As the roster currently sits, I'd say we'll be in the 4-6 range. That being said I hope we make some improvements via trades.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - Hypermav - 07-17-2022

THJ - (0) + Wood - (Burke, Brown, Boban and Chriss) - Brunson + (0) + Luka (24 years old) + Green x Pinson / Hardy = 51 wins

Follow the science Vegas.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - ThisIStheYear - 07-17-2022

Take the over on principle. If you can’t even put a 50 win team around Luka, an MJ, Lebron, Magic, Bird level player, you are an absolute trash front office.  We should be looking at a minimum of five finals and two or three titles with competent front office work in a top 5 market. There are no excuses.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - Berknip - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 07:50 AM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/nbabet/status/1548409404482940930

Last year the Vegas line was 48.5 wins....down 1 win to 47.5 wins right now and 7th in the West.

Maybe I’m blind but no odds for LAL? Are they zero? Ephemeral? Or just not seeing the whole list?


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - Hogmelon - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 12:11 PM)Berknip Wrote: Maybe I’m blind but no odds for LAL? Are they zero? Ephemeral? Or just not seeing the whole list?

PointsBet currently has no odds (2022-23 regular season wins) posted for the Jazz, Lakers, Nets, and Knicks.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - Hogmelon - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 08:27 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I’ll take the over.

So will I, Dan.  And, for now, you can get a 5% "bonus" (by betting $100 to win $105 when the Mavs win more than 47.5 games).


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - SleepingHero - 07-17-2022

FWIW I think last year's 48.5 win total placed the Mavs 5th best in the league behind UTA, PHX, LAL, and GSW. Nuggets were essentially tied with the Mavs too. So Vegas had the Mavs as a 5-6th seed. 

https://www.oddsshark.com/nba/nba-season-win-totals-betting-odds

These odds basically place us in the same bracket 4-7th. And I am undoubtedly taking the over.


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins (7th in West) - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-17-2022

https://basketnews.com/news-175305-luka-doncic-not-involved-in-recruiting-players-to-dallas-mavericks.html


RE: MAVS NEWS: Lawson deal incoming? | Vegas line: DAL 47.5 wins - mvossman - 07-17-2022

(07-17-2022, 08:27 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I’ll take the over.

I'm leaning that way too, but I would feel a lot better if we had some kind of reasonable option as the 3rd point guard.  Luka and Din had a combined 30 games missed last season.  That's a lot of minutes where this offense will be like a headless chicken.