MavsBoard
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - KillerLeft - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:37 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: NFL teams playing more and more nickel formations. Strong safety position developing into some kind of hybrid safety/linebacker.


This is absolutely true, but you'd surely agree that it's MUCH easier to tell who's playing what position in that sport, even when new combinations of them are used creatively.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - dirkfansince1998 - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:39 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: This is absolutely true, but you'd surely agree that it's MUCH easier to tell who's playing what position in that sport, even when new combinations of them are used creatively.

Basketball has another dimension because of the two-way aspect.
Big advantage that makes it easier to spot things in football is that they are starting from set positions before the play. But if we have to apply traditional terms for the roles...Is a safety that plays close to the line of scrimmage still a safety? What about a linebacker that will always drop into coverage?


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Kammrath - 07-07-2022

https://twitter.com/TheSteinLine/status/1545072349619359744


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - mvossman - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:36 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Fundamentally disagree with this.

"A complete disaster"? Come on. JB is leaving, but we don't even know the details of whether there is a sign and trade or not. JB had the childhood dream of playing for NYK. NYK tampered like crazy to make it happen. That's not on Nico. 

Also, the offseason isn't a disaster, it has barely started. McGee is signed. Hardy was drafted. Dragic not signing isn't a disaster because we don't know what is next. 

The offseason is an INCOMPLETE right now. So some people aren't jumping to conclusions with very little data. Let's talk once the roster is set, then we can grade the offseason.

So you can disagree with the statement "complete disaster", but it would be hard to argue it has not been disappointing since the Wood trade.  The fundamental point of this post was that Folks gave Nico credit for the Wood trade, but when they have shown clear distress over the following moves, the blame has almost entirely been placed on Cuban or the "FO".  Nico himself has not be mentioned at all.

I also think there is some wishful thinking regarding the offseason barely started.  We have already failed our top priority in retaining Brunson.  I don't expect much coming out of a potential S&T other than a TPE that we will never use.  We have already made our draft pick and we have already spent all of our available exception money.  All that is left is vet mins and potential trades (with very limited assets).  I know you have high hopes for monumental trades that will make sense of some of these questionable roster decisions, but count me as wildly skeptical.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Jommybone - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:36 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Fundamentally disagree with this.

"A complete disaster"? Come on. JB is leaving, but we don't even know the details of whether there is a sign and trade or not. JB had the childhood dream of playing for NYK. NYK tampered like crazy to make it happen. That's not on Nico. 

Also, the offseason isn't a disaster, it has barely started. McGee is signed. Hardy was drafted. Dragic not signing isn't a disaster because we don't know what is next. 

The offseason is an INCOMPLETE right now. So some people aren't jumping to conclusions with very little data. Let's talk once the roster is set, then we can grade the offseason.


Agree in the sense that Golden State losing KD to Brooklyn wasn’t a COMPLETE disaster since they rescued D’Angelo Russell out of the deal, traded him for Wiggins, and developed Wiggins into a star. But still, THEY LOST KD!!!

Same goes here, even if Jalen is way short (pun intended) of KD status. This is a huge loss. Yes, there’s a salvage operation in the works that could give us a chance to make lemonade, but thems lemons we’re working with. No doubt about it.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Mavsfan12 - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:36 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Fundamentally disagree with this.

"A complete disaster"? Come on. JB is leaving, but we don't even know the details of whether there is a sign and trade or not. JB had the childhood dream of playing for NYK. NYK tampered like crazy to make it happen. That's not on Nico. 

Also, the offseason isn't a disaster, it has barely started. McGee is signed. Hardy was drafted. Dragic not signing isn't a disaster because we don't know what is next. 

The offseason is an INCOMPLETE right now. So some people aren't jumping to conclusions with very little data. Let's talk once the roster is set, then we can grade the offseason.

This is my take as well.  I think that the wood trade was BRILLIANT, that the draft night trade to snag Hardy was a very good move - possibly amazing, and that the McGee signing was a solid stroke that filled our glaring need.  JB leaving for nothing was disappointing, but he was an UFA and shit happens.  I think the damage was done earlier in the process.  The one thing that has me scratching my head is the Dragic situation.  So, yeah, incomplete pending what the Mavs do to address that situation and whether they can continue to turn some (MORE) ill fitting pieces into better ones via trade.  That said, if this were the end of moves, I would be pretty happy and ready to go for the season as a more balanced team.  Solid B so far.  If you think it was a disaster, you are being dramatic, imo.  Maybe just in a grief cycle.  I don't like losing an asset for nothing, but we also gained one out of almost thin air, so it balances out.  How many of us would have traded a pick just to remove all of those players off our roster with NOTHING coming back? Just to clear roster spots?


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? | Hardy signs 3yrs/$4.8M | Dorsey on two-way? - Chicagojk - 07-07-2022

Cuban likes bad tweets of people trashing Cuban for this offseason

Board Fantasy----  we have something lined up, we are getting KD

Board Reality-----  We sign a 26 year old to a two year contract


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - cow - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 02:15 PM)Mavsfan12 Wrote: ...that the draft night trade to snag Hardy was a very good move - possibly amazing.

Beal 2.0 fell to the 2nd round and being drafted by the Mavericks, considering their drafting acumen, are pretty big red flags.  This could easily be another Ricky Ledo situation.  

I love the Wood move as we cleared four bodies that got no burn from our bench for a fallen angel.  Even if Wood is a rental, that's a solid double with the chance of being a home run.  McGee is great but I have my bias.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - mvossman - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 02:15 PM)Mavsfan12 Wrote: This is my take as well.  I think that the wood trade was BRILLIANT, that the draft night trade to snag Hardy was a very good move - possibly amazing, and that the McGee signing was a solid stroke that filled our glaring need.  JB leaving for nothing was disappointing, but he was an UFA and shit happens.  I think the damage was done earlier in the process.  The one thing that has me scratching my head is the Dragic situation.  So, yeah, incomplete pending what the Mavs do to address that situation and whether they can continue to turn some (MORE) ill fitting pieces into better ones via trade.  That said, if this were the end of moves, I would be pretty happy and ready to go for the season as a more balanced team.  Solid B so far.  If you think it was a disaster, you are being dramatic, imo.  Maybe just in a grief cycle.  I don't like losing an asset for nothing, but we also gained one out of almost thin air, so it balances out.  How many of us would have traded a pick just to remove all of those players off our roster with NOTHING coming back? Just to clear roster spots?

We are definitely on different pages regarding this offseason.  If we do nothing else I would have a hard time giving it anything better than a D.  Our own FO set the bar making retaining Brunson their top priority, and they failed.  Wood might be decent replacement for Brunson, but there are some red flags that need to be navigated in order for that to be the case.  If he does turn out ok, then we are back where we were with Brunson regarding him potentially walking.  And he was not free.  He cost a first round pick.  I would be super pissed if we paid that pick just to dump expiring players that could all be waived.  That would be paying a first to avoid tax.

The Hardy pick was fine, but it is what it is, a mid second lotto pick that likely will turn into nothing.  Most folks on here were very disappointed when his name was called.

Not impressed with signing a mid 30s backup center to 3 guaranteed years well over the vet min.  There is a real good chance that contract becomes a negative asset within a season.

As of right now we have a gaping hole from a playmaking/creation standpoint.  If we are done it means we are going into the season with two players than can pass the ball and credibly run an offense.  We made this same mistake last offseason (another D for me) and didn't rectify it until a mid season trade that gutted our frontcourt depth.  It seems like we really struggle to maintain reasonable center and point guard depth at the same time.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Mavsfan12 - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:32 PM)cow Wrote: Beal 2.0 fell to the 2nd round and being drafted by the Mavericks, considering their drafting acumen, are pretty big red flags.  This could easily be another Ricky Ledo situation.  

I love the Wood move as we cleared four bodies that got no burn from our bench for a fallen angel.  Even if Wood is a rental, that's a solid double with the chance of being a home run.  McGee is great but I have my bias.

Yeah, I like the move back into the draft on its own merits.  They had a guy rated highly and they went and got him.  That deserves praise.  Of course the move could be inconsequential if Hardy doesn't turn into a player.  But that is not the topic I was commenting on.  But if we are commenting on it, I think that kid has an incredibly high floor.  If nothing else, he is a cold knockdown spot up shooter with an NBA body.  That alone is worth the investment. If he never developed further than that, it would be a success.  That is why I put that it COULD be amazing... if he does develop as a creator/facilitator, and further if he can defend.  The last one is where I have my doubts - he was pretty bad in that dept.  But dude can shoot.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - soog - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 12:36 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Fundamentally disagree with this.

"A complete disaster"? Come on. JB is leaving, but we don't even know the details of whether there is a sign and trade or not. JB had the childhood dream of playing for NYK. NYK tampered like crazy to make it happen. That's not on Nico. 

Also, the offseason isn't a disaster, it has barely started. McGee is signed. Hardy was drafted. Dragic not signing isn't a disaster because we don't know what is next. 

The offseason is an INCOMPLETE right now. So some people aren't jumping to conclusions with very little data. Let's talk once the roster is set, then we can grade the offseason.

Gotta support this take. All of this whining about the offseason is really surprising to me.  That is why I started the thread with the poll asking people to assess the performance of the MBT. I was surprised that inspite of the constant negative rhetoric, Nico and his team received an overwhelmingly positive vote of approval.

Another point on JB is that he was lost partly because he was not an RFA, which is on Donnie. Nico showed with Hardy they were not going to make the same mistake as the previous regime.

I think it is more of a symptom of "same ol' fans" rather than "same ol' mavs".


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - cow - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:40 PM)Mavsfan12 Wrote: Yeah, I like the move back into the draft on its own merits.  They had a guy rated highly and they went and got him.  That deserves praise.  Of course the move could be inconsequential if Hardy doesn't turn into a player.  But that is not the topic I was commenting on.  But if we are commenting on it, I think that kid has an incredibly high floor.  If nothing else, he is a cold knockdown spot up shooter with an NBA body.  That alone is worth the investment. If he never developed further than that, it would be a success.  That is why I put that it COULD be amazing... if he does develop as a creator/facilitator, and further if he can defend.  The last one is where I have my doubts - he was pretty bad in that dept.  But dude can shoot.

His stroke is nice.  I think he could easily have a Seth Curry role on an NBA team with the potential of a lot more but like I said, lots of red flags.

(07-07-2022, 03:42 PM)soog Wrote: Another point on JB is that he was lost partly because he was not an RFA, which is on Donnie. Nico showed with Hardy they were not going to make the same mistake as the previous regime.

JB is a disaster but that's not on Nico.  I've said it before but the hope was Nico and Kidd would be much better at the relationship game than Donnie and Carlisle while also overcoming some of Cuban's incompetence.  In not even being able to secure a meeting with JB's camp, fair or not, I do lose some of that hope.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Mavsfan12 - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:34 PM)mvossman Wrote: We are definitely on different pages regarding this offseason.  If we do nothing else I would have a hard time giving it anything better than a D.  Our own FO set the bar making retaining Brunson their top priority, and they failed.  Wood might be decent replacement for Brunson, but there are some red flags that need to be navigated in order for that to be the case.  If he does turn out ok, then we are back where we were with Brunson regarding him potentially walking.  And he was not free.  He cost a first round pick.  I would be super pissed if we paid that pick just to dump expiring players that could all be waived.  That would be paying a first to avoid tax.

The Hardy pick was fine, but it is what it is, a mid second lotto pick that likely will turn into nothing.  Most folks on here were very disappointed when his name was called.

Not impressed with signing a mid 30s backup center to 3 guaranteed years well over the vet min.  There is a real good chance that contract becomes a negative asset within a season.

As of right now we have a gaping hole from a playmaking/creation standpoint.  If we are done it means we are going into the season with two players than can pass the ball and credibly run an offense.  We made this same mistake last offseason (another D for me) and didn't rectify it until a mid season trade that gutted our frontcourt depth.  It seems like we really struggle to maintain reasonable center and point guard depth at the same time.

If it was easy, everyone would do it.  haha.  

I understand your concerns, I just don't share them as fully as you do.  We don't have a "gaping hole".  I think we may have been spoiled a bit last season having 3 starting quality PG's on our roster.  That was insane depth that allowed us to do things that very few teams ever get to do.  

While I am hopeful that we can swing a deal or two to continue to improve, I think we are a better team today than when the season ended.  That earns a B from me.  FWIW, we would have it as an A- if we had done all of what we had and retained JB at the price he was signed for by NY.  Probably would have nudged it up a bit to B+ had we nabbed Dragic for Vet min.  If all we do is get a capable backup PG, that is probably where I would rate this offseason.  Improved, but not great.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - mvossman - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:42 PM)soog Wrote: Gotta support this take. All of this whining about the offseason is really surprising to me.  That is why I started the thread with the poll asking people to assess the performance of the MBT. I was surprised that inspite of the constant negative rhetoric, Nico and his team received an overwhelmingly positive vote of approval.

Another point on JB is that he was lost partly because he was not an RFA, which is on Donnie. Nico showed with Hardy they were not going to make the same mistake as the previous regime.

I think it is more of a symptom of "same ol' fans" rather than "same ol' mavs".

I have not seen that thread.  It must not have been recent?  I think most folks could agree that the offseason started off great with the Wood trade, but has been disappointing since, particularly the Brunson loss.  The timing of that thread would probably have a lot to do with the tenor of the response.

And I call it like I see it.  I don't consider myself to be particularly pessimistic.  This FO has performed poorly for many years and this team would not be relevant at all if they had not made the one very good move to get Doncic.  I'm not one of those guys that said it was a lucky move or a no brainer.  I gave them a ton of credit for getting him when good organizations were ahead of us in the draft order (Suns, Hawks, Griz).  But in the years before and since, for every good move they make, it seems like they make 2 or 3 poor ones.

I'm not a fan of the derogatory term "Whining" when referring to a reasoned critique.  For the same reason I don't refer to (arguably overly) optimistic folks as "sunshine pumpers".  We can all have different opinions without being derogatory.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? | Hardy signs 3yrs/$4.8M | Dorsey on two-way? - Kammrath - 07-07-2022

https://twitter.com/NotJackKemp/status/1545152620964319237


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - mvossman - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:55 PM)Mavsfan12 Wrote: If it was easy, everyone would do it.  haha.  

I understand your concerns, I just don't share them as fully as you do.  We don't have a "gaping hole".  I think we may have been spoiled a bit last season having 3 starting quality PG's on our roster.  That was insane depth that allowed us to do things that very few teams ever get to do.  

While I am hopeful that we can swing a deal or two to continue to improve, I think we are a better team today than when the season ended.  That earns a B from me.  FWIW, we would have it as an A- if we had done all of what we had and retained JB at the price he was signed for by NY.  Probably would have nudged it up a bit to B+ had we nabbed Dragic for Vet min.  If all we do is get a capable backup PG, that is probably where I would rate this offseason.  Improved, but not great.

We don't need 3 starting PGs, but we need a legitimate 3rd point guard and we don't have one on the roster.  Frank has shown himself not to be that, and I don't think you want to rely on a second round pick that struggled in the G league for that role.  The problem is exacerbated by the fact that none of our top seven guys could even be considered secondary playmakers.  For folks that would like to see this offense be a little less Luka centric, we have moved in the opposite direction.

I feel like thinking this team is better than last year is either really underselling Brunson, or expecting a whole lot from Wood or both.  I hope Luka has a healthy season, because this team will be a disaster when he is out.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? | Hardy signs 3yrs/$4.8M | Dorsey on two-way? - Kammrath - 07-07-2022

https://www.dmagazine.com/sports/2022/07/assessing-the-mavs-offseason/


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Scott41theMavs - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 04:13 PM)mvossman Wrote: We don't need 3 starting PGs, but we need a legitimate 3rd point guard and we don't have one on the roster.  Frank has shown himself not to be that, and I don't think you want to rely on a second round pick that struggled in the G league for that role.  The problem is exacerbated by the fact that none of our top seven guys could even be considered secondary playmakers.  For folks that would like to see this offense be a little less Luka centric, we have moved in the opposite direction.

I feel like thinking this team is better than last year is either really underselling Brunson, or expecting a whole lot from Wood or both.  I hope Luka has a healthy season, because this team will be a disaster when he is out.

I think it's too early to do a post-mortem on this offseason yet. I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on most likely two if not three more moves.

If we're sitting here with this roster at the end of July, then I'm on board with your point. Having just two trustworthy PGs is pretty nightmarish. But the common sense side of me presumes that there's no way we're going into the season without addressing that concern, and perhaps one or two others.


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - Smitty - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 03:42 PM)soog Wrote: I think it is more of a symptom of "same ol' fans" rather than "same ol' mavs".

I have officially seen it all…


RE: MAVS NEWS: interest in Thybulle? Kyrie?? | Hardy to sign 3-yr deal - soog - 07-07-2022

(07-07-2022, 04:01 PM)mvossman Wrote: I have not seen that thread.  It must not have been recent?  I think most folks could agree that the offseason started off great with the Wood trade, but has been disappointing since, particularly the Brunson loss.  The timing of that thread would probably have a lot to do with the tenor of the response.

And I call it like I see it.  I don't consider myself to be particularly pessimistic.  This FO has performed poorly for many years and this team would not be relevant at all if they had not made the one very good move to get Doncic.  I'm not one of those guys that said it was a lucky move or a no brainer.  I gave them a ton of credit for getting him when good organizations were ahead of us in the draft order (Suns, Hawks, Griz).  But in the years before and since, for every good move they make, it seems like they make 2 or 3 poor ones.

I'm not a fan of the derogatory term "Whining" when referring to a reasoned critique.  For the same reason I don't refer to (arguably overly) optimistic folks as "sunshine pumpers".  We can all have different opinions without being derogatory.

I posted it right after it was announced that JB was definitely signing with the knicks and not even meeting with the Mavs. It actually had 9 votes of approval versus 2 votes of disapproval, so very different from the tone of the board lately.
https://mavsboard.com/showthread.php?tid=2217

When I use the word "whining", I am not referring to the "reasoned critiques". I'm referring to the unreasoned critiques that seem to complain for complaining's sake.