(07-06-2022, 01:15 PM)F Gump Wrote: Probably. It also was what was negotiated, so it had to do with what his agent wanted too, and it was mixed with their analysis of what they expected they would have to do when it came to re-sign him and how it would be most advantageous. They gambled on "wait as long as possible before we have to decide on a new deal" and lost.

The 3-year deal is no guarantee. Or a 3-year with an option, Parsons signed that deal with HOU and got away, because it got too rich for their blood. So they only got him for 3 years not 4. RFA is only an opportunity, not a guarantee -- and if we think about it, if the Mavs could have matched the Knicks offer, they apparently wouldn't have, given that the DAL offers were significantly less, so JB would have left anyhow.

• Height w/o shoes: 6' 3"
  
• Wingspan: 6' 5.25" (!!)
  
• Excellent athlete with good testing numbers.
  
• Shot 39.7% from three the last three season in Europe.
  
• Averaged 18.9 pts, 2.9 ast, 4.2 rbd, 1.1 stl, 2.8 TO per 36 mins the last three seasons .
  

(07-07-2022, 07:12 AM)Kammrath Wrote: Averaged 18.9 pts, 2.9 ast, 4.2 rbd, 1.1 stl, 2.8 TO the last three seasons.

(07-07-2022, 07:12 AM)Kammrath Wrote: RE: Tyler Dorsey

• Height w/o shoes: 6' 3"
  
• Wingspan: 6' 5.25" (!!)
  
• Excellent athlete with good testing numbers.
  
• Shot 39.7% from three the last three season in Europe.
  
• Averaged 18.9 pts, 2.9 ast, 4.2 rbd, 1.1 stl, 2.8 TO the last three seasons.
  

(07-07-2022, 07:04 AM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/All_Things_Mavs/status/1545013574694846467

(07-07-2022, 07:04 AM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/All_Things_Mavs/status/1545013574694846467

(07-07-2022, 09:17 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: https://twitter.com/KirkSeriousFace/status/1545013356414865408?s=20&t=iconE1aWN5TlRONAeKXP1Q

(07-07-2022, 09:23 AM)mvossman Wrote: Its interesting to me how there was a ton of praising for Nico after the Wood trade, but since then as the offseason has unraveled into complete disaster, there has not been a single mention of him.  I think folks were so hopeful that Nico would turn this FO around, but if you take a step back and look at things from a distance, it was always unlikely that they were going to be able to fix a dysfunctional FO with an over meddling owner by hiring somebody with zero NBA experience.

(07-07-2022, 09:30 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: I don't know that this is fair...it might be, but then again, there absolutely IS a set of financial parameters in place, and I'm not talking about only what the rules will/won't allow. I'm talking about a set of "what Cuban is willing to do" rules concerning spending. We don't know exactly what they are, and I'm sure they're contingent on opportunity value (in Cuban's judgement) to a certain extent, but it's clear these rules exist. 

(07-07-2022, 09:40 AM)Winter Wrote: But the only logical answer to the present mess is to wait until the Mavericks say they're finished, and then have an opinion. I mean they could be working a S&T or a player-for-player trade, but until we hear from the FO, we won't know.

(07-07-2022, 09:44 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: Sure, that's logical. But, then again, we all came to talk Mavs, and waiting isn't really very fun.

(07-07-2022, 09:59 AM)Jommybone Wrote: Wing depth: 

Doe-Doe, Reg, Timmy, Josh, Frank, Tyler, Theo. Can’t believe they’re all hear come November.

(07-07-2022, 10:05 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Can't be.....and really Frank, Josh and Tyler aren't really even wings.  They can play a little there.  I view Wings as 6'7 to 6'9 guys.    And Theo probably can't be counted on to help on the floor besides a few spot minutes.

(07-07-2022, 10:18 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Interesting that you say their names with THJ on the list too. To me, Green is yhe most wing-y of that group. The others are pure SGs or Gs.

(07-07-2022, 10:26 AM)Jommybone Wrote: Huh. When I was playing (80s & early 90s), traditional lineups were 2 guards, 2 forwards, 1 center. And modern lineups were 1 point, 2 wings, 2 posts. So “wing” has a different meaning in my mind.