MavsBoard
MAVS NEWS: - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: MAVS NEWS: (/showthread.php?tid=2172)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - F Gump - 12-09-2022

(12-07-2022, 11:08 AM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: Before we give the FO too many passes due to the recent successes, don't forget we functionally traded KP and JB (two near all-stars this year) for SD (6th man) and DB (most expensive bench-warmer ever). Seems our talent evaluation needs to improve.

This is a very accurate observation about the Mavs ongoing desperate need for EXPERT Evaluation, and it goes hand-in-hand with the need for Expert Negotiation. It's not enough to know the worth to you of Player X or Y, but you also need to be able to excel in the way you navigate the competitive waters whether acquiring or disposing of them.

KP is a good example. He was holding the Mavs back. So the decision to get rid of him was good evaluation.

But their ability to get his value back in return? Not good at all. That accurate evaluation was negated by their negotiating ineptness.

What they got wasn't just a happenstance of opportunity, but rather a failure to know how to win a deal. The fact that they took on 2 bad contracts that the Wiz badly wanted to move AND had to give the best player in the deal AND had to sweeten the deal with a pick, rather than getting a pick and some commensurate talent to make up for all that bad salary, that was getting pantsed -- an outcome that's not anything new for Cuban in doing deals.

The excellence in competitive negotiation is what allows a team to efficiently acquire player assets, and turn them into more assets when they aren't the answer for this team. The Mavs tend to suck at the latter. Some of that is tied into poor evaluation skills beforehand, either in getting the player in the first place or in figuring out what he should be worth on the market, but there's also a lack of skill in playing good old fashioned poker with 29 other front offices. (And Cuban's NBA and Shark Tank go-to tactic of simply paying more than the competition doesn't work in the NBA, where every owner is a billionaire and where league cap rules tend to punish those who lose negotiations.)


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - Mapka - 12-09-2022

(12-09-2022, 03:52 AM)F Gump Wrote: This is a very accurate observation about the Mavs ongoing desperate need for EXPERT Evaluation, and it goes hand-in-hand with the need for Expert Negotiation. It's not enough to know the worth to you of Player X or Y, but you also need to be able to excel in the way you navigate the competitive waters whether acquiring or disposing of them.

KP is a good example. He was holding the Mavs back. So the decision to get rid of him was good evaluation.

But their ability to get his value back in return? Not good at all. That accurate evaluation was negated by their negotiating ineptness.

What they got wasn't just a happenstance of opportunity, but rather a failure to know how to win a deal. The fact that they took on 2 bad contracts that the Wiz badly wanted to move AND had to give the best player in the deal AND had to sweeten the deal with a pick, rather than getting a pick and some commensurate talent to make up for all that bad salary, that was getting pantsed -- an outcome that's not anything new for Cuban in doing deals.

The excellence in competitive negotiation is what allows a team to efficiently acquire player assets, and turn them into more assets when they aren't the answer for this team. The Mavs tend to suck at the latter. Some of that is tied into poor evaluation skills beforehand, either in getting the player in the first place or in figuring out what he should be worth on the market, but there's also a lack of skill in playing good old fashioned poker with 29 other front offices. (And Cuban's NBA and Shark Tank go-to tactic of simply paying more than the competition doesn't work in the NBA, where every owner is a billionaire and where league cap rules tend to punish those who lose negotiations.)

Yeah, or that was just the best deal available.

With most of the deals the Mavs do, you can at least see why they do it.
That’s more than you can say about half the league.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - DanSchwartzgan - 12-09-2022

Interesting topic on the 77th Heaven Pod this morning.  Cato and his co-host did a draft of "most important" players to the success of the team for the entire season and potentially the playoffs”.  This is based not only on what they've done so far, but for the role you envision them taking as the year progresses.  Here is the order they came up with:

1. Luka (obviously)
2. Dinwiddie (when you only have two guys who can dribble and create...)
3. Maxi (indispensable skill set.  Closes, but also plays with Wood which makes his contribution to the team work)
4. DFS (Good at both the 3 part and the D part plus a little bounce off the dribble.  Best wing defender)
5. Green (almost went 4th.  Has become important with D, 3 and especially ability to get to the rim and score or create)
6. THJ (could have been Wood, The Mav’s style needs a good volume shooter.  Good Tim makes this team good).
7. Wood (great production offensively.  Adds dimensions that we didn't have.  Not a star, but adds a lot) 
8. Powell (Slightly above replacement level big.  Has limitations, but he maxes out what the team tries to do both ends)
9. Bullock  (as bad as he's been, it is important to the Team that he figure it out eventually in order to get his D on the court).
10. Hardy  (Changes the ceiling if things go well.  They think he will get some opportunity before the year is out)
11. Kemba (probably behind Hardy in terms of impact he might have.  They don't have a strong feeling about his contribution)
12. Bertans (if we are going to shoot tons of 3's, then he probably gets minutes here and there)
13. McGee (He can't be this bad and sooner or later they will need him to do something)

Like we do a lot here, this was a bit of a love-fest for the potential of Green and Hardy.  It was also an acknowledgement of the importance of the roles Maxi and DFS play.  Not stars, but valuable contributions that Dallas can't live without.

They think Green has secured at least a 25 minutes a night bench role.  He makes the minutes when one of Luka or Dinwiddie are out more dynamic.  Not a primary ball handler, but who else can touch the paint on a drive and score on their own or make a great pass as the D collapses on him.  The team's pace is up to league average the last five games and they think Josh getting more minutes has been a factor.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - mvossman - 12-09-2022

(12-09-2022, 07:25 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Interesting topic on the 77th Heaven Pod this morning.  Cato and his co-host did a draft of "most important" players to the success of the team for the entire season and potentially the playoffs”.  This is based not only on what they've done so far, but for the role you envision them taking as the year progresses.  Here is the order they came up with:

1. Luka (obviously)
2. Dinwiddie (when you only have two guys who can dribble and create...)
3. Maxi (indispensable skill set.  Closes, but also plays with Wood which makes his contribution to the team work)
4. DFS (Good at both the 3 part and the D part plus a little bounce off the dribble.  Best wing defender)
5. Green (almost went 4th.  Has become important with D, 3 and especially ability to get to the rim and score or create)
6. THJ (could have been Wood, The Mav’s style needs a good volume shooter.  Good Tim makes this team good).
7. Wood (great production offensively.  Adds dimensions that we didn't have.  Not a star, but adds a lot) 
8. Powell (Slightly above replacement level big.  Has limitations, but he maxes out what the team tries to do both ends)
9. Bullock  (as bad as he's been, it is important to the Team that he figure it out eventually in order to get his D on the court).
10. Hardy  (Changes the ceiling if things go well.  They think he will get some opportunity before the year is out)
11. Kemba (probably behind Hardy in terms of impact he might have.  They don't have a strong feeling about his contribution)
12. Bertans (if we are going to shoot tons of 3's, then he probably gets minutes here and there)
13. McGee (He can't be this bad and sooner or later they will need him to do something)

Like we do a lot here, this was a bit of a love-fest for the potential of Green and Hardy.  It was also an acknowledgement of the importance of the roles Maxi and DFS play.  Not stars, but valuable contributions that Dallas can't live without.

They think Green has secured at least a 25 minutes a night bench role.  He makes the minutes when one of Luka or Dinwiddie are out more dynamic.  Not a primary ball handler, but who else can touch the paint on a drive and score on their own or make a great pass as the D collapses on him.  The team's pace is up to league average the last five games and they think Josh getting more minutes has been a factor.

This is very close to where I would be, and for many of the same reasons.  I do think there is some shuffling depending on regular season vs playoffs.  In the playoffs Maxi and Bullock will be higher (I think Maxi is too high in this list for regular season) and Green and Powell will probably be lower.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - mvossman - 12-09-2022

(12-09-2022, 01:23 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Murray is not young.

He was 25 when he got traded.  I would consider that young.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 7th Net | 7th in West | - ItsGoTime - 12-09-2022

(12-09-2022, 11:10 AM)mvossman Wrote: He was 25 when he got traded.  I would consider that young.
Hmmm, I looked at his age when wanting to trade for him and I would’ve sworn he was the same age as White, which is why I thought SA was trading him. Now that trade makes zero sense to me.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - Kammrath - 12-10-2022

https://twitter.com/espn_macmahon/status/1601477283759681536


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - ItsGoTime - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 12:10 PM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/espn_macmahon/status/1601477283759681536
And the game was the coach’s fault.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - Kammrath - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 01:04 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: And the game was the coach’s fault.


It is not mutually exclusive. 

With better coaching the Mavs would have won the game...they were severely outcoached, especially situationally. 

With better free throw shooting the Mavs would have won the game. 

They are BOTH true.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - KillerLeft - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 01:12 PM)Kammrath Wrote: It is not mutually exclusive. 

With better coaching the Mavs would have won the game...they were severely outcoached, especially situationally. 

With better free throw shooting the Mavs would have won the game. 

They are BOTH true.

Yeah, the biggest sting is that either of those things will get you beat, but somehow, miraculously and against one of the very best teams, the Mavs played well enough to overcome one of those things. Just not both.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - ItsGoTime - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 01:12 PM)Kammrath Wrote: It is not mutually exclusive. 

With better coaching the Mavs would have won the game...they were severely outcoached, especially situationally. 

With better free throw shooting the Mavs would have won the game. 

They are BOTH true.
What guarantee is there that if we had better coaching we would have won that game? Now what guarantee is there if we hit our FTs? One is weighted much more heavily in my mind, but all we hear about from some is the coaching. “Set aside the FTs” should never be the opening statement in any rant that had a historical FT meltdown in a game. Kidd coached them to a win, they couldn’t seal it by making 2 out of 5 FTs (not to mention all of Luka’s misses throughout).


Yes the coaching was poor during the game (but was good enough to win), but the FT shooting is completely inexcusable


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - cow - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 04:05 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Yes the coaching was poor during the game (but was good enough to win), but the FT shooting is completely inexcusable

Luka can drag a team past terrible coaching but not in conjunction with historically terrible FT shooting.  Players are going to have off nights, probably not to the extreme we saw but there is no excuse for the coaching.  We've seen these terrible inbounds sets time and time again.  It's still amazing that one of the greatest point guards ever is devoid of creativeness on the offensive end.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - dirkfansince1998 - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 09:38 PM)cow Wrote: Luka can drag a team past terrible coaching but not in conjunction with historically terrible FT shooting.  Players are going to have off nights, probably not to the extreme we saw but there is no excuse for the coaching.  We've seen these terrible inbounds sets time and time again.  It's still amazing that one of the greatest point guards ever is devoid of creativeness on the offensive end.

Kidd´s calling cards as a player were defense and transition. If you want a half court offense mastermind Steve Nash is on the market...


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - cow - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 09:42 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Kidd´s calling cards as a player were defense and transition. If you want a half court offense mastermind Steve Nash is on the market...

From bad to worse, no thanks.  Bring someone in who will coach Luka and make our offense far less Harden like.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - ItsGoTime - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 09:38 PM)cow Wrote: Players are going to have off nights, probably not to the extreme we saw
Nobody has seen it in 25 YEARS!


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - cow - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 10:00 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Nobody has seen it in 25 YEARS!

Like I said, extreme and rare.  Weird shit happens on the court.  Offensive coaching is bottom of the barrel and inexcusable.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - dirkfansince1998 - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 09:47 PM)cow Wrote: From bad to worse, no thanks.  Bring someone in who will coach Luka and make our offense far less Harden like.

That´s an innovative idea. Don´t run the franchise like a fraternity. End nepotism. Hire guys with a proven track record in the field.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - ItsGoTime - 12-10-2022

(12-10-2022, 10:20 PM)cow Wrote: Like I said, extreme and rare.  Weird shit happens on the court.  Offensive coaching is bottom of the barrel and inexcusable.
Change the coach and maybe they win. Make the FTs and they definitely win.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 19th D | 10th Net | 11th in West | - Branduil - 12-10-2022

Rotation should be:

Luka / Dinwiddie / Walker
THJ / Hardy / Pinson
Green / Bullock / Frank
DFS / Maxi / Bertans
Wood / Powell / McGee

25+ minutes in bold. This is a development year, who cares if we lose games, we're losing games NOW while trying. Play Wood now and see if you can make him a team player. Play THJ and try to get his trade value to anything at all. Green and Hardy need playing time, they're the only guys besides Luka with any substantial future.


RE: MAVS NEWS: 7th O | 11th D | 8th Net | 7th in West | - cow - 12-11-2022

(12-10-2022, 11:16 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Change the coach and maybe they win. Make the FTs and they definitely win.

Have the coach draw up new inbounds play or three and they have a definite chance to win.