MavsBoard

Full Version: Mavs 115, Nets 98
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
MAVS DOMINATE SHORTHANDED NETS
BROOKLYN HELD TO 34 SECOND-HALF POINTS

Your Dallas Mavericks moved to a surprisingly comfortable win in Brooklyn.


NOTABLE ITEMS

GAME FLOW.  Porzingis returned to action, enabling Rick to return to his “normal” starting lineup of Luka, Josh, DFS, Maxi and KP. Durant, Kyrie, and Dinwiddie were out for the Nets. 

Dallas led with a 38-26 first quarter. Fans were treated to a Luka-Harden battle, with each star putting up 15 points. The Mavs were a blistering 61% from the floor, including 6-11 from three, and closed the frame with a 14-2 run. Your boys’ three-point shooting cooled off in the second period (4-12), whereas Houston hit 7-13 in that frame. Although the Mavs lost the quarter 30-38, they carried a 68-64 lead into halftime, thanks in no small part to 20 points off 9 Brooklyn turnovers. 

The Nets collapsed in the third, with their mighty offense scoring only 18 points. The two teams combined for a putrid 2-15 from deep, but Kristaps shone with 10 points in the period. The scoreboard read 94-82 Mavs after three. The fourth was mostly garbage time, with KP and THJ appearing for only 15 seconds combined, and the Nets managing to record only 16 points. The deep-bench players got a nice run-out, and the outcome was never in doubt. 

STATS. The Maverick point differentials were +20 on points from twos, a push on points from threes, and -3 on made free throws. They shot a respectable 39% from long range (14-36), and clobbered the Nets on points in the paint (50-36). The story of the game was turnovers, with Brooklyn losing a whopping 32 points on 19 giveaways, and the Mavs giving up a stingy 9 points in that category. 

DONCIC. Luka had a relatively quiet stat line by his standards (27/6/7, 2 steals)), but make no mistake, his fingerprints were all over this contest. The young superstar put on a game-managing masterclass, and he took advantage of his superior size and strength over the dainty Nets to perfection. He also took wonderful care of the ball, recording an impressive 1 turnover in 34 minutes on the court. Rachel Nichols asked Doncic after the game what he thought about Carlisle’s recent comments about his similarity to Larry Bird, and Luka, always humble, replied that he has many games to go before he can be compared to Bird. What an amazing player!

PORZINGIS.  Kristaps looked fresh as a daisy after his time off from back stiffness, and exhibited the type of engaged performance that the Mavs presumably hoped for from him when they acquired him. He played a lot of his favored post-up game, and punished the Nets for guarding him with smaller players to the tune of 18 points and 7-13 shooting, taking only 2 three-point attempts on the night. He was quite eager for the ball, kicking a chair when Luka looked off him, and following with a missed shot from the logo early in the shot clock. After some trade rumors in the past week, I guess he wanted to make sure he got a chance to shine in this one. Perhaps more importantly, he was an important defensive factor, making an impact on the Nets’ ability to score at the rim. 

DFS.  Doe-Doe has a penchant for contributing his effective performances quietly, and this game was no exception. He put up double-digit shooting (12 points, 5-6 from the field), and stuffed the stat sheet with 8 rebounds, 4 assists, two steals, a block, and a game-high +24. His defensive presence was felt in a team-high 35 minutes, and he led the squad on the boards, and was awarded the championship belt for being the Defensive Player of the game. His highlight reel featured a magnificent chase-down block on Harden. 

HONORABLE MENTIONS. The Mavs had balanced scoring on the night, which is something they have been aspiring to. In addition to Luka’s 27 points, KP had 18, Brunson 14, Tim 13, DFS 12, and Josh 11. All Mavericks who played at least 10 minutes were in positive territory for the match. Maybe the most impressive development was the Mavs’ defensive performance in the second half, with the team clicking on that end of the floor. 

NETS. The Mavs, for the most part, played Harden in single coverage, and he responded with a game-high 29 points, albeit with an inefficient 4-11 shooting performance. He got to the line for only 8 FT attempts, and was responsible for 6 turnovers. Only two other Nets were in double figures — Jeff Green and Bruce Brown with 12 apiece. Although Brooklyn shot very poorly, hitting 32% from three and only 41% overall, it was their ghastly inability to take care of the ball that really did them in. Can’t imagine that their head coach, former Mav Steve Nash, was too proud of the night’s display. 


OBSERVATIONS

Luka congratulated his squad for playing “like a team,” and I think few spectators would disagree. Really great to see the Mavs come together, especially after their unfocused prior performance against the Sixers. Defensive juggernauts the Nets are not, and Dallas took full advantage of the Nets’ ineffectiveness on that front, abusing Brooklyn over and over in the paint. 

There is no question that the Mavericks caught a huge break with both Durant and Kyrie unable to go, but they were overdue for a stroke of luck this season, and we’ll take it. The win is welcome, but even more encouraging was the way it happened, particularly the defense in the second half and the well-coordinated effort for the whole game.

The victory brought the Mavs back to .500, at 16-16. They remain in 9th place, half a game ahead of Memphis and 1.5 games behind Denver. 

Our boys face the Magic in Orlando on Monday. We’ll see if they can sustain this level of play. 

Keep the faith, Mavs fans!
I was most impressed with DFS work on the offensive boards. I don’t care that he didn’t record a lot, he made them fight for their defensive boards. I think that matters.
(02-28-2021, 08:58 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]I was most impressed with DFS work on the offensive boards. I don’t care that he didn’t record a lot, he made them fight for their defensive boards. I think that matters.

A very good point. I think the team as a whole showed an unusual amount of hustle on the glass. A welcome development.
(02-28-2021, 08:58 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]I was most impressed with DFS work on the offensive boards. I don’t care that he didn’t record a lot, he made them fight for their defensive boards. I think that matters.

Man I loved DFS last night hustling so hard.

Can we take a moment to ask if J Rich is anything more than an okay above average NBA player?

I am waiting to notice this elite wing defender actually slow somebody down. Like his defense is fine. He will get some assists. I like his mid-range game. He can shoot the 3 okay but his average is terrible this year.

Like this is an MLE-level player right now. He's not bad, not great, he's just like an okay player.
(02-28-2021, 09:15 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Man I loved DFS last night hustling so hard.

Can we take a moment to ask if J Rich is anything more than an okay above average NBA player?

I am waiting to notice this elite wing defender actually slow somebody down. Like his defense is fine. He will get some assists. I like his mid-range game. He can shoot the 3 okay but his average is terrible this year.

Like this is an MLE-level player right now. He's not bad, not great, he's just like an okay player.

The most impressive thing about JRich so far is his ability to crate his own shot off the dribble with the mid-range jumper or rim attacks.  With the ball out of Luka's hands, he and JB seem to have the most success.  I don't really care for his 3P shot selection but even I'm surprised at how low his 3P percentage is.  I just have a hard time remembering all of his misses.
(02-28-2021, 09:15 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Can we take a moment to ask if J Rich is anything more than an okay above average NBA player?

I am waiting to notice this elite wing defender actually slow somebody down. L


JRich totally stopped Harris yesterday. Totally. Harris scored just one three pointer against him and another 2 threes when being guarded by others - every time result of WCS drop coverage.
K glad to know he is doing something. It doesn't really jump off the TV screen.
After KP's success closer to the rim last night, I think we can predict how opponents will focus on getting the ball out of KP's hands immediately after he gets it, and also trying to deny him from getting the ball in that area at all. 

The Mavs just need to be prepared and have a plan for working around them trying to front KP with their tallest player, as well as to plan for cutters for him to dish it to as soon as he gets doubled.
(02-28-2021, 09:15 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Man I loved DFS last night hustling so hard.

Can we take a moment to ask if J Rich is anything more than an okay above average NBA player?

I am waiting to notice this elite wing defender actually slow somebody down. Like his defense is fine. He will get some assists. I like his mid-range game. He can shoot the 3 okay but his average is terrible this year.

Like this is an MLE-level player right now. He's not bad, not great, he's just like an okay player.

I haven't dived into his career performance or anything, but based on his performance in Dallas, I would say, on a scale of 1-10, he rates about a 5.5-6.5 on most nights. 

More versatile offensively than DFS and Maxi. Hasn't lived up to the hype as far as shutting down waterbugs, but offers some resistance on the defensive end.
(02-28-2021, 10:25 AM)omahen Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Can we take a moment to ask if J Rich is anything more than an okay above average NBA player?

I am waiting to notice this elite wing defender actually slow somebody down. L

JRich totally stopped Harris yesterday. Totally. Harris scored just one three pointer against him and another 2 threes when being guarded by others - every time result of WCS drop coverage.


I think people forget that good NBA defense doesn't always involve a steal, block, or in-your-face miss. Sorta like how you never hear the names of the best NFL corners because opposing teams don't even throw their way, guys like JRich can make a real impact simply by making the right defensive choices and playing an effective scheme. I agree that I want to see more from the guy, but let's not discount his successes just because they aren't flashy.
Mavs pre switched any pick and roll action with Green or DAJ when KP was on the floor. Most of the time Richardson or DFS (whoever wasn´t guarding Harden) switched onto KPs man and defended the pick and roll. Good adjustment from the coaches to protect KP.
Also a great option to stop a helio centric offense. DFS-Richardson switched the Harden pick and roll and succesfully prevented penetration more often than not.
Harden still made some difficult shots but I can live with a contested step back 3. Mavs obviously made some mistakes and miscommunication lead to some open 3s but overall it was a success.
Questions are. Why did they play drop defense with WCS? Is it possible to play a similar scheme against teams with more scoring options? Without Irving and Durant the Nets lacked additional shot creators to take advantage of mismatches. KP on Brown or TLC is something that I happily give up if it prevents a Harden drive. KP on Irving or Durant would have been a different story.
(02-28-2021, 12:49 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: [ -> ]Questions are. Why did they play drop defense with WCS?


Yeah, that defense was terrible. Lead to several open threes, among them all three from Harris.
(02-28-2021, 12:49 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: [ -> ]Why did they play drop defense with WCS?


So, I am one of the bigger WCS fans here, I think. I don't think he's trash at all, and I believe he makes a positive difference most nights, even on some nights when he's not playing well. In fact, during KP's recent struggles, WCS has been the best defensive big on the team, imo. 

But, I noticed last night that Luka is STILL having to point to spots on the floor and tell him what to do in certain actions with certain player combinations out there. At this point, I have to say that's pretty unacceptable, as he has been here long enough to expect more from him. This season, he has even had consistent playing time. James Johnson seems to have a better grasp over his responsibilities, for comparison, and he's much newer. 

You never want to call someone stupid, or to suggest that they're not working hard enough. And, to be fair, I have no idea what's really going on with the dude, but there's something just off about what you get from him. I think that A) Carlisle is getting more from him than his other pro coaches have and B) despite that, it's pretty clear why he's not a more established NBA player. Pretty sure this will be Willie's last year in Dallas.
(02-28-2021, 12:49 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: [ -> ]Mavs pre switched any pick and roll action with Green or DAJ when KP was on the floor. Most of the time Richardson or DFS (whoever wasn´t guarding Harden) switched onto KPs man and defended the pick and roll. Good adjustment from the coaches to protect KP.
Also a great option to stop a helio centric offense. DFS-Richardson switched the Harden pick and roll and succesfully prevented penetration more often than not.
Harden still made some difficult shots but I can live with a contested step back 3. Mavs obviously made some mistakes and miscommunication lead to some open 3s but overall it was a success.
Questions are. Why did they play drop defense with WCS? Is it possible to play a similar scheme against teams with more scoring options? Without Irving and Durant the Nets lacked additional shot creators to take advantage of mismatches. KP on Brown or TLC is something that I happily give up if it prevents a Harden drive. KP on Irving or Durant would have been a different story.

Excellent observations. I don't think the scheme would have been viable with Kyrie and Durant out there.
(02-28-2021, 07:24 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]Dallas led with a 38-26 first quarter. Fans were treated to a Luka-Harden battle, with each star putting up 15 points. The Mavs were a blistering 61% from the floor, including 6-11 from three, and closed the frame with a 14-2 run. Your boys’ three-point shooting cooled off in the second period (4-12), whereas Houston hit 7-13 in that frame.
Kinda like the Raiders always associated with Oakland?  Big Grin


As always and excellent write up and always my first stop for an after-game summary and analysis!
(02-28-2021, 06:09 PM)michaeltex Wrote: [ -> ]Kinda like the Raiders always associated with Oakland?  Big Grin


As always and excellent write up and always my first stop for an after-game summary and analysis!

Oops! 

I did that two or three times, thought I had caught them all. I guess my mind doesn't want to let go of Harden from Houston, lol.
(02-28-2021, 11:09 AM)mtrot Wrote: [ -> ]After KP's success closer to the rim last night, I think we can predict how opponents will focus on getting the ball out of KP's hands immediately after he gets it, and also trying to deny him from getting the ball in that area at all. 

The Mavs just need to be prepared and have a plan for working around them trying to front KP with their tallest player, as well as to plan for cutters for him to dish it to as soon as he gets doubled.

I haven't tried to drill down in the stats on this, but it seems that, if the Mavs intend to post KP up as a regular means of offense, a great deal depends on enabling him to establish position on the low block. He seems less effective trying to work from the elbow.
(02-28-2021, 07:24 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]Kristaps looked fresh as a daisy after his time off from back stiffness, and exhibited the type of engaged performance that the Mavs presumably hoped for from him when they acquired him. He played a lot of his favored post-up game, and punished the Nets for guarding him with smaller players to the tune of 18 points and 7-13 shooting, taking only 2 three-point attempts on the night. 

So Coach Carlisle found out the post-up is not completely dead after all.   Tongue