MavsBoard

Full Version: Mavs 118, Trailblazers 121
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
MAVS COMEBACK ATTEMPT FALLS SHORT


The Mavericks dug themselves out of a hole to tie the game late with an impressive fourth-quarter run, but in the end, the effort was a day late and a dollar short. 


GAME STORY

The Blazers were missing key members of their rotation in C J McCollum, Jusuf Nurkic, Zach Collins, and Rodney Hood. Mavs reported no injuries or illnesses. 

Inside of three minutes, the Blazers took a lead and maintained it for the entire first quarter. The Mavs were soon down double digits. Late in the period, Enes Kanter and DFS scuffled and drew double techs. With about 2 1/2 minutes left, the Mavs had four offensive rebounds and five shots on one possession, but did not connect. Dallas trailed 25-34 after one. 

The second contained some embarrassing moments, including: a KP air-balled three; a possession where the Blazers scored after three offensive rebounds; a bobbled rebound allowing a put back; and Kanter overpowering KP in the paint on multiple possessions. Luka continued to get mauled, and absorbed a flagrant one from Jones, who hit him in the face, apparently inadvertently, and left him looking dazed. The event ignited the young star, who scored 11 points in the last 1:42 of the half. Dame was not happy with the officiating, and was called for a T with less than a minute to go. The Mavs went into the locker room with a 61-58 lead. 

Dallas was undone in the third quarter. A few lowlights included: several Mavs standing waiting for a rebound and Jones flying in over them for the offensive board; a strip resulting in a Blazers transition and-one after a timeout; another turnover and Blazers score on the ensuing possession;  a shot clock violation; a DFS foul of a three-point shooter; and Kanter bullying WCS in the paint. The Mavs had Dame in foul trouble for most of the quarter, but did not press their advantage. On the brighter side, DFS had a steal on an inbounds pass, and Luka executed a beautiful floater three on the run. Our boys scored 30 points in the quarter but gave up a horrid 45. Blazers led 103-91 headed into the fourth. 

The Mavs fiddle-faffed around for the first part of the fourth, and were down 13 at the 6:24 mark. Then, they caught fire, and reeled off a 12-0 run. After a couple of scoring exchanges, the teams were knotted at 116-all with less than a minute remaining. Lillard fired off a step-back three. Luka slammed in a dunk with 27 seconds left, giving the Mavs a 1-point deficit. Dallas elected not to foul, and the Blazers bled the shot clock before ending the possession with a Jones layup. The Mavs still had a chance to tie the game, down three with 7 seconds to go. Luka got a good look at a three, but the shot went in and out, and the ball went out of bounds off Brunson. Game over. 


STATISTICS

The Mavericks’ tepid three-point shooting (14-41, 34%) did not match the Blazers, well, blazing 45% from deep. The Mavs, however, had an advantage at the line, and are to be commended on a 24-25 performance on freebies. The point differentials were -2 on points from twos, -12 on points from threes, and +11 on made free throws. Our men also gave up 21 second-chance points. Rick’s clutch lineup was Luka, Brunson, Josh/THJ, DFS, and KP. 


PLAYERS

DONCIC. Luka had another amazing night — 44 points, 14-20 shooting, 5 of 8 from three, 11 of 12 from the line, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists. He hit some gorgeous, difficult shots, was absolutely on fi-ah at the end of the second, and scored in double digits in every quarter. He battled hard, played pretty decent defense, and did his best to put the team on his back. When he missed the last shot, he knelt on the court and put his hands over his head in disappointment and chagrin. 

After the game, he took responsibility for failing to tie the game, saying he should have made that shot. I think he was being a little hard on himself — they wouldn’t have been in a position to tie the game without him. Rick said afterward that he believes the load on Luka game after game is too much, and they can’t expect him to keep scoring 40-point games and filling the stat sheet night after night. He said the team needs more balance in the attack, and they have to find ways for the other guys to start shouldering more of the scoring load. We'll keep an eye on that. 

PORZINGIS.  KP had a a good enough line — 18 points, 8 rebounds, 2 blocks and a steal, but I didn’t think he played all that well. He took only 9 shots, although he did go 8-8 at the line. Maybe that’s partly on the coaching staff, but it seemed like he didn’t take enough advantage of having the ball on the block against smaller players, and passed on some occasions when it seemed to be a better move to shoot. He was in foul trouble for parts of the second half. Kanter bullied him, and Dame blew by him. One of the reporters asked Rick if it would be a good idea to get KP going more in first quarters. Rick replied that it would be dandy if all the players got going in first quarters. Me-ow. 

DFS. Doe-Doe had his shooting boots on, and recorded 14 points on 5-8 shooting, including 4-7 from three. He had some exciting plays, including: a three, followed by forcing a jump ball, in the second quarter; the aforementioned steal on the inbounds pass; and, a three to tie the game with 49 seconds left. He seemed to be the primary defender assigned to Lillard, which didn’t work out too well — Dame was just too quick for him.

BRUNSON. Jalen played 34 minutes off the bench, scored 11 points, served as an able playmaker, and was part of the finishing lineup. He and Luka played off each other particularly well, I thought. The Mavs were a team-high +14 when JB was on the court. 

ODDS AND ENDS. THJ had 12 points off the bench, but was 4-12 from the floor. Maxi put up 8 points and 6 boards, but did not seem effective on the defensive end, and was not in the closing unit. Richardson did not have much of a line (6/2/3), and turned the ball over three times. He was originally part of the clutch lineup, but played his way off the floor, being replaced by THJ at the 2:13 mark. WCS served as the third big, appearing for 16 minutes. He had 2 points and 5 rebounds, but did not seem any better able to defend than the other bigs. Burke was on the court for 10 minutes, and had 3 points. 

TRAILBLAZERS. Despite being down 4 of their key players, the Blazers easily handled the Mavericks, save for a couple of outstanding stretches in the second and fourth quarters. Lillard, a noted Mavs killer, went off for 34 points and 11 assists. Could have been worse. Has been, in point of fact. Carmelo, lumbering along at age 36, contributed 15 points off the bench. The Blazers had six guys in double figures, counting Trent (17), Covington (15), Kanter (14), and Simons (12), in addition to Dame and Melo. 


OBSERVATIONS

Rick was disappointed at the loss, but didn’t seem too shocked by it. He characterized the game as a tale of two very good quarters and two very poor quarters, and emphasized that his team has to play more consistently. He admitted that there was a defensive miscue on Dame’s late three-point shot. The Mavs were supposed to run and double-team, as they had discussed in the prep, but between the masks and the noise in the arena and whatnot, the players didn’t hear the coaches calling for the double. Really?

Offensively, this team continues to live and die by the three. Aside from DFS, Luka and Burke, the other Mavs went 4-24 from long range. They’re going to have to do better than that. They did get to the line well, with Luka and KP combining for 20 attempts. On any given night, 118 points could well be enough to generate a win in these degenerate days. However, the defense just did not show up consistently, and for much of the game, our boys just couldn’t string enough stops together. One could quibble over some of the coaching choices on specific items, but overall, the guys just didn’t play quite well enough. 

I found it somewhat disappointing that the Mavs couldn’t overcome a a decimated Portland team at home, but there were a few encouraging things to take from this contest. The team did well, overall, in the last five minutes, which hopefully bodes well for the future. Luka put in a fantastic performance, and a few of the role players were solid. They just didn’t look very in sync, and maybe that will improve with time. If just a couple of plays had gone a different way, most fans would be smiling and telling a sunnier story. Stats professionals would tell us that point differential is a much better predictor of success than W-L record, and, from that point of view, this was essentially a tie against a good Western Conference team. 

On the bright side, Luka set a franchise record in this match for the most consecutive 25+ point games in team history, with 14. I’m sure he would have preferred a win, but congrats anyway, young fellow! I’m sure many more records will fall to your talents!

Anyway, the Mavs get a rare couple of days off now, and will face Detroit on Wednesday. 

’Til then, MFFLs!
Thansk mavsluvr.

Mavs lost in a heatbreak in the end, after Dame's deep three (he was open, but it was still deep and there just a couple of players in this league who will make this shot - unfortinately, Dame included) and Luka missing a wide-open one from his favorite spot (Im did not check but I would bet a lot of money that his 3-point-percentage is, by far, best from the left wing (not corner).

To be honest though, it never felt that they played good enough to win this one. I don't know what happened during our run in the fourth, I would have to go back and watch some film to say whether the Blazers got cold or we changed something defensively, but apart from this stretch, we played pretty poorly overall. The defense still looks really bad, our offense, however, looks stabkle enough to put up points. We are still way too 3-point-shot hungry and when it doesn't fall and we keep trying, it looks very bleak. I skipped thorugh a big chunk of this game when they could not buy a bucket.

I thought KP looked better than you gave him credit for, we criticized him for being too shot hungry and I think it was a conscious effort on his part to drive and pass more.

We need better defense and more driving and/or inside basketball. How do we achieve this? is it just mindset? is it the gameplan? or are we just missing key ingredients. I have to admit I really don't know.
(02-15-2021, 08:00 AM)meistermatze Wrote: [ -> ]I would have to go back and watch some film to say whether the Blazers got cold or we changed something defensively


I guess a bit of both. Lillard missed two free throws, a couple of missed threes...


(02-15-2021, 08:00 AM)meistermatze Wrote: [ -> ]The defense still looks really bad


I actually thought it looked good for most of the game. There were some lapses. Lillard walked for a layup a couple of times, Mavs were unable to defend against Kanter at times. On the other hand they really frustrated Lillard and his scoring was mostly far from easy. Portland role players hit a bunch of (very) contested threes. Simmons and Covington turned into Ray Allen for the night. 


(02-15-2021, 08:00 AM)meistermatze Wrote: [ -> ]I thought KP looked better than you gave him credit for, we criticized him for being too shot hungry


The problem I have with him is, that he is not able to take advantage of his height against smaller opponents. He is far more effective against bigger and slower players. He was still bad on defense and mostly played very soft.
(02-15-2021, 04:45 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]MAVS COMEBACK ATTEMPT FALLS SHORT


The Mavericks dug themselves out of a hole to tie the game late with an impressive fourth-quarter run, but in the end, the effort was a day late and a DAME dollar short. 

.... 

Anyway, the Mavs get a rare couple of days off now, and will face Detroit on Wednesday. 

’Til then, MFFLs!

Kudos on another really good write up despite another disappointing loss ML.  Definite all star team starter among Mav's writers, anywhere.   Big Grin    


This can't be good.   Has former Carlisle, Dallas assistant Terry Stotts actually been a better coach than Rick, post championship years?  Huh   There's been a bit of a pattern over the years I've noted in Portland's coaching quality. 

Quote:Despite being down 4 of their key players, the Blazers easily handled the Mavericks,

Not really good enough if you're the #2 star on a 2 star team.  Several Mavs role players are doing a pretty good job filling their roles, but if you're the #2 star you have be elite for the team to beat the quality of teams in the West. 
Quote:KP had a a good enough line — 18 points, 8 rebounds, 2 blocks and a steal, but I didn’t think he played all that well.


Mavs have some guy getting zeroed out who is at least an elite offensive and rebounding threat.  

There's this big guy who, kinda like Kanter provided balance to Portland's attack, could uh score and rebound but uh nevermind.  
Yeah, let's keep searching the roster for Luka load helpers.  Rolleyes 

Quote:Rick said afterward that he believes the load on Luka game after game is too much, and they can’t expect him to keep scoring 40-point games and filling the stat sheet night after night. He said the team needs more balance in the attack, and they have to find ways for the other guys to start shouldering more of the scoring load. We'll keep an eye on that. 


This guy makes the Mavs must see TV all by himself!  Big Grin

Quote:DONCIC. Luka had another amazing night — 44 points, 14-20 shooting, 5 of 8 from three, 11 of 12 from the line, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists. He hit some gorgeous, difficult shots, was absolutely on fi-ah at the end of the second, and scored in double digits in every quarter. He battled hard, played pretty decent defense, and did his best to put the team on his back. When he missed the last shot, he knelt on the court and put his hands over his head in disappointment and chagrin. 
Thanks mavsluvr!
Think they lost the game because of 3Q's slappy ball handling and mny bad passes with too many unnecessary TO's which lead POR into 10+ advantage.
But I also think mavs improved in D but POR shootd excellent, there where almost none open 3p  shoots for them but they scored anyway. Plus mavs didn’t protect the paint well, again...
There was a mistake not to double Dame in clutch, but last mavs play which put Luka on 3p freeway was excellent.
Mavs didn't play bad they lost against better shooting team that evening.
As I see mavs they are trending positive.
But:
After last season I hoped mavs will upgrade roster with D, BBIQ,  youth, height, athleticism ...  and mavs actually went into that direction. How successfully we are slowly starting to see...
After little more than 1/3 of the season we see brutally high scoring games every day all around the league. Mavs have room to improve for sure but did they choose the right direction in now days league, that’s the question on my mind lately. And then I read this:

https://twitter.com/coopmavs/status/1361...89024?s=20

What do you think?
(02-16-2021, 05:36 PM)FunkBoreland Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/pandahank41/status/1...33281?s=19

Free JRich!!!!
(02-15-2021, 08:00 AM)meistermatze Wrote: [ -> ]To be honest though, it never felt that they played good enough to win this one. I don't know what happened during our run in the fourth, I would have to go back and watch some film to say whether the Blazers got cold or we changed something defensively, but apart from this stretch, we played pretty poorly overall. The defense still looks really bad, our offense, however, looks stabkle enough to put up points.
I agree with this, meister. If this defense doesn't improve pronto, I have a hard time seeing how they maintain relevance.

(02-16-2021, 05:36 PM)FunkBoreland Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/pandahank41/status/1...33281?s=19

I thought that was a little strange. I though the Mavs sold JRich as being a guy who could defend waterbug point guards.
(02-17-2021, 09:58 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]I thought that was a little strange. I though the Mavs sold JRich as being a guy who could defend waterbug point guards.


Don´t have any numbers (might do some research later) but I think when it comes to players like Lillard or Curry it was mentioned by numerous coaches, experts and media guys that bigger defenders are the better option on defense. Smaller defenders simply cannot contest the jumper. They just shoot over them.
(02-17-2021, 10:22 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: [ -> ]Don´t have any numbers (might do some research later) but I think when it comes to players like Lillard or Curry it was mentioned by numerous coaches, experts and media guys that bigger defenders are the better option on defense. Smaller defenders simply cannot contest the jumper. They just shoot over them.

Thanks for the input, dirkfan. So, it sounds like, if the commentators are right, Richardson simply cannot defend guys like Lillard or Curry, and we should not expect him to. If that is the case, then it is what it is, but I think it is a departure from how he was presented. Iirc.
(02-17-2021, 10:46 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the input, dirkfan. So, it sounds like, if the commentators are right, Richardson simply cannot defend guys like Lillard or Curry, and we should not expect him to. If that is the case, then it is what it is, but I think it is a departure from how he was presented. Iirc.

Don´t think that it is the case for all guards. More about guys with deep 3-point range and a quick release. They aren´t bothered by a late contest or a smaller guy in front of them. As long as they have an unobstructed view of the rim the shot is basically uncontested.
Smaller guys need to play them super close to get a hand in their face and that makes it a lot easier to beat the defender of the dribble. A longer defender can get a hand up, contest the shot and still leave some room to prevent easy penetration.
(02-17-2021, 10:59 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: [ -> ]Don´t think that it is the case for all guards. More about guys with deep 3-point range and a quick release. They aren´t bothered by a late contest or a smaller guy in front of them. As long as they have an unobstructed view of the rim the shot is basically uncontested.
Smaller guys need to play them super close to get a hand in their face and that makes it a lot easier to beat the defender of the dribble. A longer defender can get a hand up, contest the shot and still leave some room to prevent easy penetration.

I hear what you are saying. 

I guess the issue is that our longer defender, DFS, wasn't able to affect him that much, either. I guess with some of these guys, you have to employ a scheme to limit them. The Mavs certainly aren't the only team that has been torched trying to defend guys like Dame and Steph one-on-one.
My guess is that DFS is the best defender the Mavs tried on Lillard who Portland wouldn’t immediately force to switch off.  It’s kind of a misnomer that the defense gets to choose who guards who. Mavericks fans should know this as well as anyone, because I’d guess 40% of the Mavs offense is forcing switches until Luka gets to go against someone he’ll destroy.