MavsBoard

Full Version: Mavericks 99, Hornets 118
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
MAVERICKS HUMBLED IN HOME OPENER

Whoo-ee. That was brutal. Just brutal. Did not see that coming. 

The young Hornets humiliated the Mavs on their home floor on a night where pretty much nothing went right for Dallas. 


GAME STORY

The Mavs got off to a half-decent start, even beginning the game 6-0. The Hornets fought back, and Dallas took what would turn out to be their last lead of the game on a Hardaway layup with 2:10 left in the first. Charlotte made a little run to close the quarter, and the Mavericks were down 29-36 after twelve minutes. 

The game was pretty close in the first half of the second, before the Hornets bench whooped up on the Mavs some, and took a 15-point lead. The home team hit a couple of threes, but gave up a pull-up to Rozier. They entered the locker room trailing 57-68. Some halftime commentators debated about whether the Mavs could climb out of the 11-point hole. They needn’t have worried. The worst was yet to come. 

The Hornets started the third with a 5-0 run, prompting Rick to call a timeout 40 seconds in. To no avail. Charlotte put 16 points on the board before the Mavs could score, and then just had a point on 1-4 free throws by Willie. With 5:11 left, Dallas had scored three points in the period and were down by 30. By the 2:56 mark, they reached a game-high 31-point deficit. They ended the frame with an ignominious 12 twelve points scored, as against 30 from their opponents. 69-98.

Dwight Powell and the reserves acquitted themselves decently in the fourth quarter, and the final scoreline of 99-118 actually flattered the Mavs. 


NOTABLE ITEMS

  1. General performance. I hardly know what to say. The Mavs just looked bad in every aspect of the game. Nothing like the team that blew out the Clippers on Sunday. Out of sync, poor body language, lack of attention to detail, looked like a pick-up game. I thought they might have turned a corner in Los Angeles, but it looks like they’re still trying to play themselves into a rhythm. After the game, one of the players said something to the effect that they are still working the kinks out, and that in a normal athletic year, they would still be in pre-season at this point. Probably something to that. It seems to be a factor around the league. 
2.  Passing. The Mavs have been trying to work on ball movement, and some nights go better than others. I have been hoping not to have to mention this, but there have really been some howlers when anybody and everybody fancies himself a facilitator. A few examples. WCS threw a football pass from his own goal line that sailed over Tim at midfield and landed somewhere in the opposite end zone. Yikes. Maxi was near the rim and had a shot, but instead attempted a no-look back pass to James Johnson in the corner. Hardaway threw from the three-point line all the way across the court into the stands. All three of these “plays” resulted in turnovers. And I’m sorry to say that these weren’t the only times these players have indulged in these on-court creative fantasies this season. I don’t discourage moving the ball, but maybe they should consider saving the flashy passes for guys who do that for a living. 

3.  Shooting. There was a lid on the basket for the Mavs in this one. They shot below 50% from inside the arc, 29% on threes, and a horrendous 58% from the line. This is compared to 56/41/81 from the Hornets. The Mavs got up 3 more shots, 8 more threes, and 12 more free throws than the opponents, but dismally failed to capitalize. The problem was widespread: Richardson 1-10; Burke 1-9; DFS 2-8; Brunson 5-13. Doe-Doe, Richardson, Luka, and Burke combined to go 2-21 from deep. The team took 33 free throws and missed 14. Yikes. I do have to say that the team was getting open shots, at least for a while, but not hitting the basket. So, at least the offense was working to a degree for a time. The leading scorers were: Hardaway 18, Brunson 16, Maxi and Luka 12 each. 

4. Possessions. The Hornets had a 50-39 rebounding advantage. Although the Mavs took pretty good care of the ball (14 turnovers) and forced 23 giveaways from Charlotte, their edge in points off turnovers was only 7 points. As for defense, they left it in Los Angeles. The Hornets had numerous open threes, and got to the rim at will. 

5. Hardaway. If there was a bright spot for the Mavs, it would have to be Tim. He was 7-10 from the floor, including 3-6 from three. He had a team-high 18 points, and also led the team in minutes (28). In his post-game interview, he said he thought the key to winning was to defend hard on every defensive possession and secure the rebound if one is available, which they didn't. He said they can’t control the score, but they can get out there and do their best every night, and they didn’t do that on this night. Said he can’t think of an excuse for the performance. 

6. Doncic. Luka had a 12/2/5 line with 3 turnovers, which is terrible by his high standards. Rick reminded us that he played only 24 minutes, but I don’t think Luka would want excuses made for him. It was painful to see him struggle. He was 0-5 from three, which brings him to 2-21 for the season. A couple of those were airballs. After the game, while people were giving their interviews, he was out on the court putting up shots. Afterward, he admitted that his legs are so “very tired.” Reporters peppered Rick with questions about what was wrong with Luka, and Rick became impatient at what he viewed as scapegoating. He acknowledged that Luka “doesn’t have his rhythm yet,” and predicts that his young star will be fine. In spite of a slow start, I agree with that. 

7.  Centers. The big men were underwhelming, despite the fact that they were opposing a smallish team. They combined for 28 points and a lame 14 rebounds. Powell had 9 points and 4 boards, but did most of his damage when the game was already out of reach. At one point, he went up for a dunk, but got fouled and had a wedgie, sending chills and thrills through wedgie aficionado Mark Followill. Maxi hit 4-5 threes in the first quarter, but never took another shot. WCS had 5 points and 3 rebounds in 9 minutes, was 1-4 from the line, and had 4 fouls in his brief time on the floor. Bobi had a mere cameo at the end.

8. Bench. Brunson did a good job leading the reserves in the fourth, and scored 11 points in the frame. Burke had 4 assists and 2 steals in 20 minutes, but was 1-9 from the floor. James Johnson was ejected after his second technical in the last three minutes of the game. He was T’d up before for some infraction on the bench. His second T was called as a result of a fracas with the Martin twins involving elbows, head butts, jawing, and scowls. Perhaps it’s just a small bump in the road in the context of the game, but technical fouls should be spent wisely, and one has to wonder whether they should be used on the bench and in the dying minutes of a game that has already been decided. Of course, I don't know the details of the provocations, and we may never find out. 

9. Hornets. The Hornets were substantial underdogs before the game started, and were supposed to be one of a couple of teams that the Mavs “should” beat in their first ten games. Coming off their 51-point slaughter of the Clippers, perhaps the Mavericks underestimated this young team. The Hornets, to their credit, played very hard on both ends of the court, and put together a respectable performance. Bench players LaMelo Ball and Miles Bridges destroyed the Mavs, combining for 42 points and 24 rebounds. 


OBSERVATIONS

Rick termed the contest an “ugly game” and a “disappointing loss.” He thought his team got dominated in the first three quarters, and was proud of their fight back in the fourth. His takeaway was that you can’t play for 12 minutes of a 48-minute game and expect to win. He noted that the Mavs didn’t match the Hornets’ aggressiveness and physicality, and didn’t adjust by attacking the rim when their threes weren’t falling. He was very defensive of Luka, and I got the impression he was very much not enjoying the interview.

I don’t want to make any excuses for this lukewarm performance, and I don’t. I do note, however, that there is a lot of this going around the league. Lower-tier teams decisively beating favorites, blowouts everywhere you look, and very little consistency. I think, from an overall league perspective, this may just be what you get with a very short training camp and almost no offseason. A lot of bad basketball, as teams play their way into shape. 

This was a disappointing loss, and although we should take it seriously, I don’t think we should overreact and go jumping off bridges over it. The team looked very good just a few days ago, and that is something to build on. It is clear from the first four games that this group are a ways off from having settled into an identity at this point, and over the next few weeks, we’ll be a witness to seeing them become who they are — a process that usually takes place behind the curtain in pre-season. 

I don’t take too much away from this game, one way or another. Better times are coming. They have to be. 

The Mavs play the Heat next, on Friday. Meanwhile, HAPPY NEW YEAR to all the MFFLs!!!
Great review, especially the conclusion. It's a relief to read something on this forum that doesn't include whining or dramatic conclusions about people they know nothing about.
https://twitter.com/townbrad/status/1344...61186?s=21

Starters remain an issue. This feels like a throwback to the ugly Andrew Bogut-days right now. Just a clearly dysfunctional starting unit that more often than not leads to slow starts and facing uphill battles all night long.

According to bballref.com:

Luka+Jrich+Tim+DFS+Powell:

41 minutes played, -16.5 points per 100 possessions.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/pla...neups/2021
2 man lineups where you combine Luka and a big:

Luka and Maxi: +1.1 point per 100 possessions in 62 minutes

Luka and WCS: +46 points per 100 possessions in 27 minutes

Luka and Powell: -20 points per 100 possessions in 66 minutes
My new year looks brighter knowing I have mavsluvr game reviews to look forward to. 

I agree that this is painful; that the league looks like this for now and it is not just us; that the starting unit is in flux and Rick will lead them out of this; that there is no need to lose hope (for Mavs fans and for life in general); that noting flaws and criticisms is just fine; and finally, that we need to break a long losing streak to the Heat this Friday, January 1 (6:00 PM start I think).
Great recap.  I’m puzzled by how lifeless they look.  I missed the Clippers game, so I’ve only seen the 3 turds.  The other complete puzzler is Carlisle’s insistence on starting Powell. Last year he tinkered with lineup for 15 games with myriad guys starting.  The only constant was KP and Luka.  He finally settled at game 15.  You know he knows it ain’t working, yet he keeps sticking with it.  I’m perplexed. 

No one can shoot a lick right now, so it might not matter.  The only fun I’m having is watching James Johnson.  The only player consistently bringing heart and energy.....with a dash of helter skelter.
(12-31-2020, 10:47 AM)Reunion Mav Wrote: [ -> ]I agree that this is painful; that the league looks like this for now and it is not just us; that the starting unit is in flux and Rick will lead them out of this; that there is no need to lose hope (for Mavs fans and for life in general); that noting flaws and criticisms is just fine; and finally, that we need to break a long losing streak to the Heat this Friday, January 1 (6:00 PM start I think).

haha, well said, RM!
(12-31-2020, 12:50 PM)SweetFidelia Wrote: [ -> ]The only fun I’m having is watching James Johnson.  The only player consistently bringing heart and energy.....with a dash of helter skelter.

He's my new favorite Mav. Handles, passing, defense, toughness, and energy. I'm sure he'll be traded because of his contract, but I want him here long term.
(12-31-2020, 12:50 PM)SweetFidelia Wrote: [ -> ]Great recap.  I’m puzzled by how lifeless they look.  I missed the Clippers game, so I’ve only seen the 3 turds.  The other complete puzzler is Carlisle’s insistence on starting Powell. Last year he tinkered with lineup for 15 games with myriad guys starting.  The only constant was KP and Luka.  He finally settled at game 15.  You know he knows it ain’t working, yet he keeps sticking with it.  I’m perplexed. 

No one can shoot a lick right now, so it might not matter.  The only fun I’m having is watching James Johnson.  The only player consistently bringing heart and energy.....with a dash of helter skelter.

Thanks, SF. It's too bad that the Clippers game was the one you missed, because the Mavs displayed in that match that they still have it in them to to play well. 

With respect to you and everyone else presenting the Powell question, I sometimes wonder whether we fans get a little too wrapped up in whether Powell is starting or not. I haven't seen anything to indicate that the team would have done significantly better in any of the four games if Powell had played his minutes at a different time in those games. Happy to be corrected, if I missed the evidence. In any case, once KP gets back, the lineups will be reworked, and Powell's role will be different. I'm not saying there are no concerns about Powell -- there are, but I question whether rearranging the deck chairs while Porzingis finishes his recovery is going to accomplish much of anything. 

On another aspect involving lineups, I have been impressed with Josh Richardson and how well he has fit in. However, last night's poor shooting performance by him led me to focus on the implications of the loss of Seth Curry. The move to a bigger, two-way player doubtlessly needed to be made. However, it is easier for teams like the Hornets to clog the paint with Josh in the lineup. It was often hard to even get Seth many shots, since defenders tended to stick to him like glue. Josh is also capable of hitting threes, but for whatever reason, doesn't seem to command that level of defensive respect. So when his shots aren't falling, he isn't helping nearly as much with floor spacing. I do not say this as a knock of Josh -- it is just one of many issues resulting from the personnel changes that the coaches will need to sort out as the season rolls along.    

I also enjoy watching Johnson. He is actually a pretty skilled player, as well as being the ultimate energy guy. His ability to facilitate some has been a welcome bonus. And the dash of helter skelter is definitely adding some brio to the game!
(12-31-2020, 12:50 PM)SweetFidelia Wrote: [ -> ]The only fun I’m having is watching James Johnson.  The only player consistently bringing heart and energy.....with a dash of helter skelter.
I myself have to add JRich to this having fun watching. He was getting after several of his defensive assignments last night from full court. We haven't seen that in such a long time. I know his offense isn't where we want it to be right now, but I think the more familiar with the team he gets the more he'll look better there (as well as KP coming back and he doesn't have to do as much). That defensive intensity is being viewed for all to see on this team though and hopefully he and JJ show HOW to do it, and WHAT to do as a game time example. I want that to be contagious!
I thought the Mavs started the game well, had decent energy on defense, but couldn´t really find an offensive groove early. The Hornets hit some tough shots and gained the lead. The lack of resilience was puzzling as it felt like the Mavs had already given up in the 2nd. 

So what´s the take away?

1) Rick must sit Powell´s ass ASAP. I´m the biggest RC believer, but this is too obvious and should be backed up by all analytics. Today I wanted to explain to my brother how bad Powell looked defensively and all I came up with as an example was 40 year old Dirk and thinking about that, the comparison is not off. Absolutely unplayable. 

2) We need rebounding and toughness and I´m ready to trade pieces away for that. Burke and Brunson seem to be redundant and not a good fit. Try to package one of them for frontcourt help! And this issue is not solved by KP coming back.

3) Man, we miss Seth way more than I thought we would. He is such an baller. His efficiency was kind of contagious it seems like. Guys just saw the ball going through the net. In almost every game last year we went on some kind of run energized by quick threes and some Luka stuff. It seems to be mostly gone. On the other hand I love the defense by J-Rich, so jury´s still out on that one.

4) Luka man. I´ve said a lot regarding that and was criticized hard by Omahen. So I will stay silent for now.
(12-31-2020, 07:26 PM)Thukydides Wrote: [ -> ]I thought the Mavs started the game well, had decent energy on defense, but couldn´t really find an offensive groove early. The Hornets hit some tough shots and gained the lead. The lack of resilience was puzzling as it felt like the Mavs had already given up in the 2nd.


Totally agree with this part. Why the Mavs came out of the locker room at halftime so energyless is just puzzling. Immediately first Charlotte offense THJ got switched on Washington and offered absolutely zero resistance. Come on, at least foul him if he is too big for you! Then it just went downhill. With every missed shot Mavs had less will to play defense. Carlisle tried to stop it, but nothing worked. Timeout after 30 seconds or so, Powell went out after 2 minutes I think but WCS didn't help. Then I think it was Kleber turn with no change. 

I also noticed extreme lack of communication on defense. So many times guys didn't know if they are switching or not, both guys running after same guy all the time. Remmeber that time, when Rozier was completely open for a mid range jumper? Mavs were playing zone and Luka went from Rozier to defend corner three, expecting Maxi to close up, which didn't happen. Not saying it was necessarily Maxi fault, but it was obvious lack of communication. 

Games against Lakers and Charlotte can't be blamed on one or two players, it was a total team thing. Of course Luka is worse than last year, but so are many others. DFS is shooting 27 % from three on same good looks he got last year, for example. He is shooting almost 6 threes per game. Powell is not playing well but its not like WCS and Kleber are game changers. Neither provides rim protection. Johnson half the board is raving about has eFG of 36 %. One thing I didn't understand was why they didn't post up Luka more. Especially that Bacon guy had absolutely no chance against him and I think Luka was posting up only once in the whole game.

All that being said, we are still operating on a very small sample. Mavs were shooting badly in all games, considerable difference from preseason games. Shots will eventually start falling as they are having good looks and things will look much better. We need to be patient and not overreact. Season is long.
(12-31-2020, 07:26 PM)Thukydides Wrote: [ -> ]I thought the Mavs started the game well, had decent energy on defense, but couldn´t really find an offensive groove early. The Hornets hit some tough shots and gained the lead. The lack of resilience was puzzling as it felt like the Mavs had already given up in the 2nd. 

I was also bewildered by that. It looked like they were hanging their heads by halftime. Go figure. 

So what´s the take away?

1) Rick must sit Powell´s ass ASAP. I´m the biggest RC believer, but this is too obvious and should be backed up by all analytics. Today I wanted to explain to my brother how bad Powell looked defensively and all I came up with as an example was 40 year old Dirk and thinking about that, the comparison is not off. Absolutely unplayable. 

I can see where you're coming from. Pretty soon, KP will get back, and Powell's role may well diminish. I will be surprised if Carlisle "sits his ass" completely at this early stage. He is coming off an Achilles tear and many months away from basketball, so I don't think his leash will be limited to four games. That injury typically takes a while to recover from (as in, more than one season), and I look for the Mavs to try to make it work. But a serious question exists as to whether he will ever be the same player. His old burst and explosion have been notable by their absence. And if rim protection and rebounding is what is primarily needed for that spot now, he was never A+ in that department, even in his best days. But WCS and Bobi aren't plug-and-plays for that role.  I would guess that Powell's role is adjusted, but not completely eliminated, soon.

2) We need rebounding and toughness and I´m ready to trade pieces away for that. Burke and Brunson seem to be redundant and not a good fit. Try to package one of them for frontcourt help! And this issue is not solved by KP coming back.

I agree that Brunson and Burke are similar players, and Carlisle has already largely broken up the pairing. I'm not convinced that they really need an additional rebounding body, or if they do, I don't think it needs to be a major piece. They have plenty of players who are capable of being good rebounders in normal times -- they're just not doing their job very well yet. 

3) Man, we miss Seth way more than I thought we would. He is such an baller. His efficiency was kind of contagious it seems like. Guys just saw the ball going through the net. In almost every game last year we went on some kind of run energized by quick threes and some Luka stuff. It seems to be mostly gone. On the other hand I love the defense by J-Rich, so jury´s still out on that one.

Yes, the thing that has hit me most about this is how much Seth spaced the floor, whether he ever took a shot or not. They still have enough shooters that I think the tradeoff for better defense is worth it, but having a guy that tied up a defender that closely every night is a dimension they had to sacrifice for it. For now, anyway. 

4) Luka man. I´ve said a lot regarding that and was criticized hard by Omahen. So I will stay silent for now.

LOL, that would strike fear into my heart, too. Luka is such a competitor, I really think he will be okay. Worst case, maybe they have to shut him down for a week or two and have him do intense conditioning, like they did with Dirk that year he showed up out of shape. That's presuming he doesn't somehow get hurt, of course. But, I guess it remains to be seen. 

Good thoughts. 
Luka has no other choice but to go in and penetrate, once his team mates weren't connecting, Charlotte clogged the lane even more.

Powell is atrocious, I'd take my gamble on Bobi. Both can hardly defend but at least Bobi will give you rebounds. If RC wants Dwight's 3.3 rebounds per game, while KP sits, then, expect to be out of the playoffs.

James Johnson shouldn't really be an option on offense. But he took it upon himself to try to get something for the team, since everybody else's shot isn't falling anyway.

Still like JRich's game. He just had an off night shooting, I expected the averages to even out after a few games including pre season he was shooting well.

RC should have let the rookies play at the half way point of the fourth. Got to give these rooks some confidence.

Seen Iwundu play for the Magic, he isn't so bad that you keep him from playing when DFS, JRich, Burke and THJ aren't clicking. On a night like that, he deserved to play.

Appreciate Brunson's willingness to take charge, but shot selection seems pretty iffy.

Noticed how DFS, Brunson and THJ are dribbling one or two after a pass when they should have probably just shoot it. They take away the open shot and make it harder on themselves.

WCS needs to start. DP is only dragging the starters down. Start WCS and set the tone, he will challenge shots as opposed to DP's token defense.
(12-31-2020, 02:44 AM)mavsluvr Wrote: [ -> ]MAVERICKS HUMBLED IN HOME OPENER

Whoo-ee. That was brutal. Just brutal. Did not see that coming. 

The young Hornets humiliated the Mavs on their home floor on a night where pretty much nothing went right for Dallas. 
...
OBSERVATIONS

Rick termed the contest an “ugly game” and a “disappointing loss.” He thought his team got dominated in the first three quarters, and was proud of their fight back in the fourth. His takeaway was that you can’t play for 12 minutes of a 48-minute game and expect to win. He noted that the Mavs didn’t match the Hornets’ aggressiveness and physicality, and didn’t adjust by attacking the rim when their threes weren’t falling. He was very defensive of Luka, and I got the impression he was very much not enjoying the interview.

I don’t want to make any excuses for this lukewarm performance, and I don’t. I do note, however, that there is a lot of this going around the league. Lower-tier teams decisively beating favorites, blowouts everywhere you look, and very little consistency. I think, from an overall league perspective, this may just be what you get with a very short training camp and almost no offseason. A lot of bad basketball, as teams play their way into shape. 

This was a disappointing loss, and although we should take it seriously, I don’t think we should overreact and go jumping off bridges over it. The team looked very good just a few days ago, and that is something to build on. It is clear from the first four games that this group are a ways off from having settled into an identity at this point, and over the next few weeks, we’ll be a witness to seeing them become who they are — a process that usually takes place behind the curtain in pre-season. 

I don’t take too much away from this game, one way or another. Better times are coming. They have to be. 

The Mavs play the Heat next, on Friday. Meanwhile, HAPPY NEW YEAR to all the MFFLs!!!

Thanks again ML especially for always giving solid coverage even of a bad Mavs performance. 

Good point about the uneveness of the games around the link.  You see a lot of teams get blown out one game and turn around and blow out another team the next game and it seems to be almost without regard to the real quality of the opponents involved.  

It shows you how training camps and full preseasons ultimate really do affect teams abilities.  Players and coaches are clearly affected and on court strategies are more simplified than usual. 
Teams haven't put in their full bag of tricks to adjust to various changes from game to game such as what to do when one part of the offensive attack isn't working or specific defensive adjustments to slow down hot opponents. 

As an aside, as a long time League Pass subscriber I've been in the odd position of not getting FoxSW on my cable subscriber (Frontier).  I know some of the workarounds but been kinda too busy to implement one yet I like or I just don't want to cough up another $100 a year just to watch the home team I should already be able to watch.   NBA is picking up my geography btw despite VPN so league pass India hasn't worked yet.  I could try harder but its easy enough for now to watch games free later from various online sources. 

Catching your wrap up is a very nice supplement.  Angel
(01-01-2021, 01:11 PM)Dahlsim Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks again ML especially for always giving solid coverage even of a bad Mavs performance. 

Good point about the uneveness of the games around the link.  You see a lot of teams get blown out one game and turn around and blow out another team the next game and it seems to be almost without regard to the real quality of the opponents involved.  

It shows you how training camps and full preseasons ultimate really do affect teams abilities.  Players and coaches are clearly affected and on court strategies are more simplified than usual. 
Teams haven't put in their full bag of tricks to adjust to various changes from game to game such as what to do when one part of the offensive attack isn't working or specific defensive adjustments to slow down hot opponents. 

As an aside, as a long time League Pass subscriber I've been in the odd position of not getting FoxSW on my cable subscriber (Frontier).  I know some of the workarounds but been kinda too busy to implement one yet I like or I just don't want to cough up another $100 a year just to watch the home team I should already be able to watch.   NBA is picking up my geography btw despite VPN so league pass India hasn't worked yet.  I could try harder but its easy enough for now to watch games free later from various online sources. 

Catching your wrap up is a very nice supplement.  Angel
 Good comments, dahl. 

This TV thing is frustrating. I still get FSSW via cable, but I like to watch European soccer and have had similar problems with beIN Sports.
(01-01-2021, 12:40 AM)Derf2Aladeen Wrote: [ -> ]Luka has no other choice but to go in and penetrate, once his team mates weren't connecting, Charlotte clogged the lane even more.

Powell is atrocious, I'd take my gamble on Bobi. Both can hardly defend but at least Bobi will give you rebounds. If RC wants Dwight's 3.3 rebounds per game, while KP sits, then, expect to be out of the playoffs.

Boban won't be used well under Rick Carlisle's offense
Boban is a guy who frustrates on defense, not to me so much because he's so bad he's not as bad as some make him out but its because he's not aggressive when he could be.  Dodgy He plays limited enough minutes that he should be able to go aggressively against those that attack the Mavs in the paint, he has fouls to spare if need be  Its just not in his nature, some coach should be in his ear about it. 

That said, Boban is an elite offensive force that can consistently give you offense when your normal high powered system just isn't working.  Per ML's post: 

Quote:CentersThe big men were underwhelming, despite the fact that they were opposing a smallish team. They combined for 28 points and a lame 14 rebounds. Powell had 9 points and 4 boards, but did most of his damage when the game was already out of reach. At one point, he went up for a dunk, but got fouled and had a wedgie, sending chills and thrills through wedgie aficionado Mark Followill. Maxi hit 4-5 threes in the first quarter, but never took another shot. WCS had 5 points and 3 rebounds in 9 minutes, was 1-4 from the line, and had 4 fouls in his brief time on the floor. Bobi had a mere cameo at the end.

RC is simply not a coach that uses Boban's offensive ability well or often, even when he gives him minutes. He puts him in the game but mostly runs his regular offense rather than using him as a elite scoring force on the offensive end as well as an elite rebounder.  

How many big men do Mavericks have that would ever, even once be able to give you 31 points and 17 rebounds against an NBA Allstar center? 

@"mavsluvr" has the pandemic affected your career at all? I’m a big fan of your work on the Mavs’ broadcast (with the lone exception of that dumb “hello winda” joke)  but I have to say I would’ve expected you to get an even better gig by now.
(01-01-2021, 02:40 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]@mavsluvr has the pandemic affected your career at all? I’m a big fan of your work on the Mavs’ broadcast (with the lone exception of that dumb “hello winda” joke)  but I have to say I would’ve expected you to get an even better gig by now.


Who is he? 

I had no idea....
Pages: 1 2