MavsBoard

Full Version: Game 54: Washington Wizards (9-43) vs. Dallas Mavericks (30-23)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
a little surprised we haven't seen Maxi at PF. Makes me wonder if that is in the plans when everyone is healthy.

This is a game where I would go without Hardaway. Just not doing a lot of good out there today. Also, I was hoping we were done with the smaller lineups.
Lively > Gafford

And I don’t think it’s close. Just a different level defensively. 

WAY too much Gafford tonight on offense and he kinda does the blockhunting thing a bit.
Hardaway has to be pushed to the Powell role now.

Beginning to understand why PJ is a 32% 3 pt shooter.
I am higher on THJ than most but I think the Mavs missed an opportunity to trade him at the deadline.
(02-12-2024, 10:31 PM)JamesConway912 Wrote: [ -> ]Lively > Gafford

And I don’t think it’s close. Just a different level defensively. 

WAY too much Gafford tonight on offense and he kinda does the blockhunting thing a bit.

Oh, for sure. It is not close.

Kleber > Gafford, except for rebounding.
I’m ready to vote for the Dirkie.
2 great passes by Luka.

Incredible swing pass by PJ there to find the hot hand.

Can the Mavs continue to play smart??????????????????
I am sooooo relieved Kyle Kuzma isn’t a Maverick.
Absolutely no reason why Hardy doesn’t take all of Hardaway’s minutes
(02-12-2024, 10:34 PM)GATA Wrote: [ -> ]Absolutely no reason why Hardy doesn’t take all of Hardaway’s minutes

There are some games where THJ is very good.

This isn't one of them.
Finally got a couple of stops and hit a couple of threes.
(02-12-2024, 10:31 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: [ -> ]a little surprised we haven't seen Maxi at PF.  Makes me wonder if that is in the plans when everyone is healthy. 

This is a game where I would go without Hardaway.  Just not doing a lot of good out there today.  Also, I was hoping we were done with the smaller lineups.

Tonight they don’t really have the option to play Kleber at PF unless they want to rely on Gafford even more. I REALLY hope Maxi at PF is a big thing going forward though. We need the size and otherwise the entire C rotation gets overcrowded with Lively / Gafford / Kleber and Powell
(02-12-2024, 10:31 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: [ -> ]   Also, I was hoping we were done with the smaller lineups.

Marvin Bagley feasted on that Luka-Kyrie-THJ-Josh Green-Maxi line up.
(02-12-2024, 10:31 PM)JamesConway912 Wrote: [ -> ]Lively > Gafford

And I don’t think it’s close. Just a different level defensively. 

WAY too much Gafford tonight on offense and he kinda does the blockhunting thing a bit.

People have been asking for a player like this for years. Mavs finally have a Drummond/Whiteside type. Just need to figure out when/how to use him. Looking at his boxscore (16pts/17reb/5blk) one would think that he dominated the game but watching it I would argue that the Mavs looked better when Kleber (0pts/2reb) was on the floor.
(02-12-2024, 10:36 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: [ -> ]There are some games where THJ is very good.

This isn't one of them.

The problem is Kids doesn't sit THJ when he starts 0-8. He just lets him keep firing up misses.
Kleber and PJ out there is the Mavs’ best option , defensively. It’s working, and it will work in the playoffs.
Never make Luka bleed.
Example of what I mean: Lively and Gafford can do some things Kleber can’t, but he is willing to sprint to closeout on a shooter. SPRINT.
Luka took this game over. Bring it home, now
QHAT THGE FHAWFNKJLERDSGAEARWDLADKLJHVBADFKVFDHJKSADFQG

WHAT ARE THESE REFS SMOKING???????????????

THEY ARE JUST MAKING UP RULES???!?!?!?!?!?/

EVEN KIDD TOOK A TIMEOUT TO ARGUE WHAT THE FGUCSDFO;IGLNKJAKJLVNVDFSGAKLAJSNA NKLS FADCSDFSAG DFGVA ADFVSGVA DBWBQWADFQEF WVQWVE DQVFWEDQWVREFzxerYHTJNM
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10