MavsBoard

Full Version: DAMERIS VIBE-CHECKS MAVS FOR D MAGAZINE
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Interview with Mike Piellucci, after 22 Games


On a scale of 1-10, how nervous are you about this team, 10 being most nervous? 

6 to 6.5. The team is still inconsistent, and the role players have not shown themselves ready to step up. They’ve changed the front office, the coaching staff, and the schemes, and they’re still a .500 team. What else is left? 

Do you believe Kidd when he seems to indicate roster changes might be necessary?

The team was built as a group of catch-and-shoot guys constituting an offensive team surrounding Luka — the Carlisle system, if you will. Kidd has moved KP more toward the middle, in an effort to change things up. Getting Dragic should provide a little more playmaking, although that’s not likely to happen until around the TDL. 

On the defensive side, they essentially exchanged Josh Richardson for Reggie Bullock, and whether that is working is TBD. Kidd and Iztok are right that the team doesn’t have the personnel to accomplish what they’re trying to do defensively, and this has resulted in the team's just treading water on that end. They also have an issue with the big men. Kidd wants to play a traditional center, and Powell and Willie don’t fit that bill. However, acquiring improved personnel by the TDL is a lot easier said than done, considering the assets they have to work with. 

The fact remains that January is the third anniversary of the KP trade. The core is essentially the same now as it was three years ago — Luka, KP, Dorian, Maxi, Powell, Brunson and THJ. And we’re still seeing inconsistency and questions about whether the team is good enough. That points to roster changes needing to be made, even if some of them have to wait until the offseason. 

Can Kidd even be realistically evaluated, with all the injuries this season?

Don’t have anything negative to say about Kidd at this point. Grade is very much an incomplete. His schemes, attempts at rotations, and culture changes all seem positive. 

You previously said that the Mavs are using this season as a laboratory, hoping that by the playoffs, they have come together with some additional things that work. Can they still afford to do that, now that their record has slipped to such an extent?

They have to walk that razor's edge of trying to implement new things in-season, while also trying to be sure they make the playoffs at all, preferably in at least the sixth seed. That’s the sort of thing the swap of Bullock and THJ in the lineups is trying to accomplish — both these players are struggling, so they'll throw something new out there for a few games, and then re-assess. That sort of tinkering is what they want to keep doing. But not at the expense of missing the playoffs. Things are very tight in the West, and a prolonged losing streak could put them out. It’s probably still a little too early to start worrying about reining in the experiments, but come January, they need to start solidifying their approach. 

How do you evaluate KP?

Playing better than he ever has. That includes the bubble, since his offense is more diverse now. Having said that, it’s frustrating that he still can’t stay healthy. His longest stretch of consecutive games as a Mav is only twelve, and that’s scary. It’s just part of what comes with KP. He’s continuously in and out of the lineup, and it's frustrating to have to accept that. 

How do you evaluate Luka this season?

Luka is fine. He is backing players down and posting up more than he used to, and the added bulk enables him to do that. I don’t have an issue with it. They’re asking him to play a little differently, playing off the ball and letting other guys bring the ball up, and they’re all still getting used to it. 

What is more troubling is that he seems pretty beat up, and they need to be sure to allow him however much treatment and rest he needs. Other than that, Luka is the least of this team's worries. 

https://www.dmagazine.com/sports/2021/12...-to-trade/
Luka is fine. He is backing players down and posting up more than he used to, and the added bulk enables him to do that. I don’t have an issue with it. They’re asking him to play a little differently, playing off the ball and letting other guys bring the ball up, and they’re all still getting used to it. 

What is more troubling is that he seems pretty beat up, and they need to be sure to allow him however much treatment and rest he needs. Other than that, Luka is the least of this team's worries.


I just don't see how he doesn't correlate these two sentiments.  It might not be the cause of Luka being nicked up but it sure doesn't help with recovery.  And speaking of that, he's dead on, they need to get Luka get right.  I appreciate the warrior mentality but I'm really worried about a more serious injury.
I think Luka’s weight has been overblown around here, but it’s obviously not intentional. Obviously. And when someone like Dameris claims otherwise, my reaction isn’t to wonder whether the claim is true, it’s to reevaluate my level of general respect for the person making the claim.
Kobe always used to bulk up a bit in the off season. His rationale was that you lose muscle during the season and so everything would even out and he could still be in top shape late into the season. 

How you bulk up is the difference . Weights vs  Cheeseburgers. 

This is year 4 though.  One thing obvious by now is that in shape or not, Luka is a poor 3 pt shooter who loves to shoot the 3. That doesn’t look like it is going to change anytime soon.
(12-11-2021, 12:22 AM)hakeemfaan Wrote: [ -> ]One thing obvious by now is that in shape or not, Luka is a poor 3 pt shooter who loves to shoot the 3. That doesn’t look like it is going to change anytime soon.

Mostly agree.  He could cut down on the degree of difficulty shots he takes but the personnel on the team really do him no favors as he isn't get passes for wide open looks.
(12-11-2021, 12:22 AM)hakeemfaan Wrote: [ -> ]One thing obvious by now is that in shape or not, Luka is a poor 3 pt shooter who loves to shoot the 3. That doesn’t look like it is going to change anytime soon.


The most infuriating part?

He takes 3.8 threes PER GAME (basically the same amount as Maxi takes in a game) where he takes 7+ dribbles immediately BEFORE the three (meaning the offense is totally stagnant and everyone is standing around watching Luka not share the ball). This is undisciplined and completely correctable.

That is annoying in and of itself. What makes it really terrible and ugly is that he shoots 28.8% on those threes.
(12-11-2021, 08:45 AM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]The most infuriating part?

He takes 3.8 threes PER GAME (basically the same amount as Maxi takes in a game) where he takes 7+ dribbles immediately BEFORE the three (meaning the offense is totally stagnant and everyone is standing around watching Luka not share the ball). This is undisciplined and completely correctable.

That is annoying in and of itself. What makes it really terrible and ugly is that he shoots 28.8% on those threes.

Doesn’t he take close to 8 3s a game?  Where is 3.8 coming from?

Do you have a breakdown on catch and shoot vs off the dribble?  I thought I remembered  reading somewhere that Luka shoots the 3 very well in catch and shoot situations.
(12-11-2021, 12:51 AM)cow Wrote: [ -> ]Mostly agree.  He could cut down on the degree of difficulty shots he takes but the personnel on the team really do him no favors as he isn't get passes for wide open looks.

That’s why I am using a 4 year sample.  Even when the team was at a historically high offensive rate Luka was a poor 3 pt shooter who took a lot of 3s. 

I agree I think his shot is good provided he doesn’t think he is Steph and takes ridiculous shots, which he unfortunately does a lot. The problem is that he has 3 bad games and will go 5-8 the next game. That somehow convinces him he is doing the right thing. 

The career percentages don’t lie though. Wasn’t he a poor 3 pt shooter in Europe as well?  Again I am not saying he shouldn’t shoot the 3. The volume especially off the dribble is what I wish he would cut down.
(12-11-2021, 11:30 AM)hakeemfaan Wrote: [ -> ]Doesn’t he take close to 8 3s a game?  Where is 3.8 coming from?


He’s saying of all the 3’s Luka takes, an average of 3.8 OF THEM come after 7 or more dribbles. It’s pretty sobering.
(12-11-2021, 11:30 AM)hakeemfaan Wrote: [ -> ]Do you have a breakdown on catch and shoot vs off the dribble?  I thought I remembered  reading somewhere that Luka shoots the 3 very well in catch and shoot situations.


Of Luka's 8.3 threes per game this year....0.9 have been catch and shoot.....and he shoots 42.1% on them. 

Whereas 3.8 threes per game with 7+ dribbles beforehand on 28.8%. 

One might say he should totally switch up how and when he shoots threes.....
I actually believe the iso, step back three is pretty crucial to opening up Luka’s game. But, I think 4 per game is too many if he’s going to shoot them at a rate of 28%.
Honestly, without that move (at a higher rate of success) he’s probably not best used as a PG.
(12-11-2021, 08:45 AM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]The most infuriating part?

He takes 3.8 threes PER GAME (basically the same amount as Maxi takes in a game) where he takes 7+ dribbles immediately BEFORE the three (meaning the offense is totally stagnant and everyone is standing around watching Luka not share the ball). This is undisciplined and completely correctable.

That is annoying in and of itself. What makes it really terrible and ugly is that he shoots 28.8% on those threes.

That's more of a roster problem than a Luka problem. Luka will just chuck up a 3 if the possession is going nowhere and no one is getting in a position for a good opportunity. This team is so short on ballhandlers Luka has to have the ball a lot. And with the way some of our "shooters" have been shooting I can't really blame him for just throwing one up here and there on a possession that wasn't going anywhere anyway. It's easier to get back on transition defense on a 3 point chuck like that (though sometimes they still don't even do that, that's actually the part that pisses me off more)
(12-11-2021, 02:16 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]I actually believe the iso, step back three is pretty crucial to opening up Luka’s game. But, I think 4 per game is too many if he’s going to shoot them at a rate of 28%.

Luka has great handles and body control. He can drive and stop on a dime like Dirk and JeT to get a mid range shot, and he has better handles than either. He is also strong enough to bully defenders in the low post. 

I understand the theory that he needs that step back because players will play him tough as he doesn’t have a great first step, but the drive, stop and pull up mid range should be used instead of the step back 3. It is such a tough, tough shot.