MavsBoard

https://twitter.com/townbrad/status/1187420055077830656

Quote:I’ll say it again: There’s no doubt in my mind that the Mavericks should have a ring from 2006. And the Sacramento Kings should have a ring from 2002. And if it wasn’t because of the officiating and the officials on the floor for certain games and the supervisor of officials back in 2006, I think they would have a ring and they should have a ring.

Unless the media retroactively voids the title from the Heat and awards it to the Mavs, I really could care less what a disgraced ref has to say.

We all saw the reffing. Everyone knows the FT disparity wasn't a fluke. That's about as good as it'll get it seems.

I care. Just cause he cheated doesn’t mean he's lying now. What interests me most is that the NBA can’t shut him up. Why no defamation suit?

(10-25-2019, 07:08 PM)Jommybone Wrote: [ -> ]I care. Just cause he cheated doesn’t mean he's lying now. What interests me most is that the NBA can’t shut him up. Why no defamation suit?

Can't really sue somebody for slander when they're telling the truth.  

(10-25-2019, 08:08 PM)embellisher Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-25-2019, 07:08 PM)Jommybone Wrote: [ -> ]I care. Just cause he cheated doesn’t mean he's lying now. What interests me most is that the NBA can’t shut him up. Why no defamation suit?

Can't really sue somebody for slander when they're telling the truth.  

Yep. That’s not the only reason they shouldn’t sue. But it sure doesn’t make me less inclined to believe Donaghy.